IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Sidrops] Re: [WGLC] draft-ietf-sidrops-rrdp-same-origin-00 - Ends 1/July/2024

Job Snijders <job@fastly.com> Tue, 18 June 2024 16:08 UTC

Return-Path: <job@fastly.com>
X-Original-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ED63C16942B for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 09:08:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=fastly.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uTKWsEXK54iL for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 09:08:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ej1-x629.google.com (mail-ej1-x629.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::629]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09192C16942E for <sidrops@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 09:08:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ej1-x629.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a6f0e153eddso731554666b.0 for <sidrops@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 09:08:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastly.com; s=google; t=1718726898; x=1719331698; darn=ietf.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=tR/KI/h0ybhWRMM75FMJro1+g7Wv+bEvTwx9K7nqaB8=; b=OzWQbD3sGsY3A616pOJwh9WPdiNZvVW/adi2thfqTNvJNOEHidlltMDIwo1lO7vkuA hEmik1V5lm2oE5kSpHe477ed3oFzZkbbsvr2aY6IBf4AMgYCFIgL8K4osntca5ru/2NJ vDZJxMZwiun+V7LC2ygwiuG9NWRHGUBF5R6WY=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1718726898; x=1719331698; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=tR/KI/h0ybhWRMM75FMJro1+g7Wv+bEvTwx9K7nqaB8=; b=blrXyiIODMPJg394tfZCQmNI4/PDNcg6Ua3vrXuxcwKxkBt3Twv/jy1Tcr8ANGO3vk U/bK1gaW/7VSMLGPOYrNwuzVySDjFlq784oMaFCwEVGFJ4/wgbZK62Lq6V9TkSc5YX5+ ciElFbpswDvPeQUKdElvRa1uZ4BhpeSzRmM/ncIvMXQpBS36c/EYKQVZeTv7wY9mfhuE JRtQcyb1viDlHI04RAko5ishfGiCGN+TwddiGng1tOtABr+6rjeIkgPAGeS+3XKbo0o4 Vs9P7TT1sSYaJiNWCDcvIFUBtZQRVsT7cNvfM0+csu6A+aIimGoYy8AGLOHZucTcmASL H9cQ==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVxjzwHOrFYGOxjqUBQTW1o1g2Fhu+rQM1NC2pctNSJrgelc4gifvoRmSnpu2k6F0WXt+0C1HQm4DviDUWMpW+S
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzBQUvXT2ecLjJL4WJBvw0gUWz3374wRKKLTBQgFwbKQIx4nwzv dopWuhT6L9o6aMqTR1R81Gfm1LTkVUy+lmm1lUrO0Aa4ngXiUj75JP6fCGpnnbqIf626QLMCPPH P
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEZtXc85qK2y4UwkAO6uF5pFLVNCMXXbEErjTn3SqQnHA8QOu8nX3t/3LvqBiNtFrrI1sWXkQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:2c11:b0:a6e:2a27:5669 with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a6f60d20e7amr890312366b.23.1718726898096; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 09:08:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from snel (mieli.sobornost.net. [45.138.228.4]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a640c23a62f3a-a6f81add1a4sm290017566b.170.2024.06.18.09.08.17 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 18 Jun 2024 09:08:17 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 18:08:16 +0200
From: Job Snijders <job@fastly.com>
To: Theo Buehler <tb@theobuehler.org>
Message-ID: <ZnGw8KLJzudLP-Eu@snel>
References: <9E606C18-78F2-408F-8180-A0ED27FBACE8@arrcus.com> <CALTLbCEu6wxnWqUKj1_3rFrHTKN4Jpf-ix44ZtnAYD0p+rZZpA@mail.gmail.com> <CAA0dE=WBTE9m6x5HrvR1wbO_0hvUEZNJGDvXagugC5jz2JnNFw@mail.gmail.com> <ZnD_nSKKnCnsnoS1@snel> <ZnEEUANK51VM4tMY@snel> <CANPYmggdZsWUiqcpjk2Aa1a55_KCN21HSmnEeRy2rx3mrF0XHA@mail.gmail.com> <ZnGtDhezSoG5Yca3@theobuehler.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ZnGtDhezSoG5Yca3@theobuehler.org>
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
Message-ID-Hash: 6OZ4P45K3PXYDR64KMMOKVMS5PMKH24S
X-Message-ID-Hash: 6OZ4P45K3PXYDR64KMMOKVMS5PMKH24S
X-MailFrom: job@fastly.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-sidrops.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: Ties de Kock <tdekock@ripe.net>, "sidrops@ietf.org" <sidrops@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [Sidrops] Re: [WGLC] draft-ietf-sidrops-rrdp-same-origin-00 - Ends 1/July/2024
List-Id: A list for the SIDR Operations WG <sidrops.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidrops/Q0q3-t2aupe9WrkMG4QNBS0QzV0>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidrops>
List-Help: <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:sidrops-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:sidrops@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:sidrops-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:sidrops-leave@ietf.org>

On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 05:51:42PM +0200, Theo Buehler wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 05:43:30PM +0200, Ties de Kock wrote:
> > On Tue, 18 Jun 2024 at 05:52, Job Snijders
> > <job=40fastly.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 05:31:41AM +0200, Job Snijders wrote:
> > > > I'm happy to remove section 2 in its entirety if it is causing you
> > > > heartburn.
> > > >
> > > > The goal of this draft proposal is just to impose new requirements
> > > > (section 3.1 and 3.2). For me it is a non-goal to explain how RRDP
> > > > works or how to implement it sanely beyond SOP, all the rest is what
> > > > RFC 8182 is supposed to do.
> > >
> > > To illustrate what the above suggestion would look like, I've attached
> > > an rfcdiff, txt, and html file. At first glance this seems an
> > > improvement to me.
> > 
> > For me the document is clearer and more concise with these changes.
> 
> I agree. I like this version better.

Thanks for the feedback y'all - new version uploaded here:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidrops/o6c37I6-kpB5SUgxPXzOFMgYmqM/

Kind regards,

Job

v2.26.15 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status