Re: [Sidrops] ASPA: Is this really a leak?

Ben Maddison <benm@workonline.africa> Wed, 16 December 2020 18:41 UTC

Return-Path: <benm@workonline.africa>
X-Original-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 917E23A0AE5 for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Dec 2020 10:41:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=workonline.africa
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zOnuUo2edTgB for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Dec 2020 10:41:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from EUR03-AM5-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr30052.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.3.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E09783A0ADB for <sidrops@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Dec 2020 10:41:23 -0800 (PST)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=Il7c5Ak/UVyZ4jZd+6uSXM9aLWJy3b0eES1oPQvap27vfWJltdqgbhKmIXq+k1wDN8plTe3NRXrI7lo1ZtJ9lkxQjUfJB7wio6HjpC2aiwPLJhdarFXwwDi1lXxT+uBzpKr/YZWwE0HOyVQlucwWatsFl0XUCWCj7WOjQOhccKHBJPkW1JQAfRLlTsTCvlk2K18RfqBzP+72Bbn3rfel8L0XxyoaDGaJ4BdDfSSI9K/9E1dWK05FDMOQC5rwS0RDseNSOQlBT4ln5lOicBftADFFE1tGIpp0jJOdA18dAg2qOnjPZG6+cYmrbHF9dg0DeoZoRn9NWHSjfAYksyIwXQ==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=5jDgKs7tFV7t1Rt+ALE6Lhhzhtn6s36j51RQUwYfF3w=; b=dhm8rieY+6cHKg72uzDGD2Rff/KlwaqHWcGyU8QhFKvCqAR8OaYAcplKuB3fvZMLvVRI22SFOGxB++NXMjA/gR0ldo8Y/+PwqiZ4x4PM5coNaK2FxgFN5c6RDY6pRZLVGwJO34nsFRYQlWc+xVaCNu3IU4R2CiAczDU1x8RZ6DIoXcLGOliqt0Y12pUIzTT+KlELUxdRzXRGSNiBiin5KtKNCgJJmU0IBlSqlYaBucq8JtY+Isc3iiInzEqn/prDGl1gmUWbf7O9SehZGu/bpp9lQvVOgztWqtFvyokaSpLt64ZD06BgzJCcTlhdpZq7La11ka68nXZ/fniqUfYfdw==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=workonline.africa; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=workonline.africa; dkim=pass header.d=workonline.africa; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=workonline.africa; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=5jDgKs7tFV7t1Rt+ALE6Lhhzhtn6s36j51RQUwYfF3w=; b=e2gKtvtmnJhDnbZHtopEflaftK4HjG5FfPhOSgR2mJHCedjMHFkbM9nilBJysZhyAEfpn0j0FYTAUy8ncbQ7LDLZDR2edn9nPo3FT91gjh0gdoHdb0t3fWlI5HJ7QmDnpLSNJ8D6nV7FgQVrVs8ZFAAVToQWGPaq0R2AMVgT0Qs=
Authentication-Results: dmarc.ietf.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc.ietf.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=workonline.africa;
Received: from DB8P190MB0746.EURP190.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:10a6:10:12a::24) by DB6P190MB0294.EURP190.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:10a6:6:3e::33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3654.21; Wed, 16 Dec 2020 18:41:20 +0000
Received: from DB8P190MB0746.EURP190.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::cdc3:7ba:4bf7:dcda]) by DB8P190MB0746.EURP190.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::cdc3:7ba:4bf7:dcda%3]) with mapi id 15.20.3654.026; Wed, 16 Dec 2020 18:41:20 +0000
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 20:41:12 +0200
From: Ben Maddison <benm@workonline.africa>
To: "Jakob Heitz (jheitz)" <jheitz=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: "sidrops@ietf.org" <sidrops@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20201216184112.vd4fxfajtka64khm@benm-laptop>
References: <BYAPR11MB3207E12FA868D4ECCF064161C0C60@BYAPR11MB3207.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <20201215125003.k4mnemxkmi2372rj@benm-laptop> <BYAPR11MB32078EDE75F76EB2843A050EC0C60@BYAPR11MB3207.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="g7pbxdvxqszxgrgs"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <BYAPR11MB32078EDE75F76EB2843A050EC0C60@BYAPR11MB3207.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
X-Originating-IP: [160.119.236.50]
X-ClientProxiedBy: JNXP275CA0043.ZAFP275.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:1086:0:18::31) To DB8P190MB0746.EURP190.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:10a6:10:12a::24)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1
Received: from localhost (160.119.236.50) by JNXP275CA0043.ZAFP275.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:1086:0:18::31) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3654.12 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 16 Dec 2020 18:41:19 +0000
X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email
X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: f88473fd-7163-4a16-2bf9-08d8a1f22e86
X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: DB6P190MB0294:
X-Microsoft-Antispam-PRVS: <DB6P190MB02943F75F6F5755F7D3B92C8C0C50@DB6P190MB0294.EURP190.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
X-MS-Oob-TLC-OOBClassifiers: OLM:7219;
X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck: 1
X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;
X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: AJ8XiBLuex60Mph0judb2w3WFyaD/7qX/e6Y/w1oewqcymxRr12Pywudmry1HFpzXBawEjE7GxCuKvyJQMjuO4tU8eE8LYO9Q5mlWh79hLvTkT+efGfKoYSDERfO/A/NijyuKaqgz5LByZO1WPIS4oVedNVUgRUrEmD0a9LejU9KKwL06JtIkoDYdREyfYn1ZWGN+q64cBN+MZKsUEAGl52s1Mw0hjZMhuVa59e49BgkubLbQXa6p8sACowBLplqaoUVOcQNnO6vtB8KMWQDV9ePWHWTcgSN2WXkMqmBdXNjky2gVMjX0m7lQgNBqe7y/mqFNxE0++I3XFlyNOhlPezpDzZ29E1BRQ/YRLcDpHT7k1Wouk23bVt7PsEpr+oq+uO/dYsF31BOp2U25JWUiA==
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:DB8P190MB0746.EURP190.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(7916004)(396003)(366004)(39830400003)(346002)(376002)(136003)(21480400003)(6486002)(9686003)(2906002)(316002)(6496006)(186003)(44144004)(6666004)(478600001)(86362001)(8936002)(26005)(52116002)(1076003)(8676002)(66476007)(956004)(16526019)(33716001)(4326008)(66556008)(5660300002)(66946007)(46492008)(2700100001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData: 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
X-OriginatorOrg: workonline.africa
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: DB8P190MB0746.EURP190.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Dec 2020 18:41:20.6851 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: b4e811d5-95e8-453a-b640-0fba8d3b9ef7
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: f88473fd-7163-4a16-2bf9-08d8a1f22e86
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-MailboxType: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-UserPrincipalName: Dk3YMsU2ROy5fWOV57Gg/3iwxpnEWORtbtGF07+sCf+rT00rOmRzZKuKJTpEumaoT0epBHP1QuTRTAKeHvcyrg==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DB6P190MB0294
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidrops/V5B8lDPrj5eA4-bv1wcPDH1DFxw>
Subject: Re: [Sidrops] ASPA: Is this really a leak?
X-BeenThere: sidrops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: A list for the SIDR Operations WG <sidrops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidrops/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidrops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 18:41:28 -0000

Hi Jakob,

On 12/15, Jakob Heitz (jheitz) wrote:
> Ben,
> 
> Your scenario is possible.
> However, it is only that: possible.
> That makes it a suspected leak, not an unequivocal leak.

Only because ASPA is not a thing yet. When it is, and we get to see an
ASPA issued by 3491, I would bet my bottom dollar 33765 won't be in it.

At that time, we can say unequivocally "that path is garbage", and drop
it on the floor.

> There are plenty of unequivocal leaks to stop.
> Let's start with those and not bring down a lot
> of unsubstantiated "suspected leaks".

I don't think you'll find many more obvious than the one you picked up.
But that isn't really the point.

Cheers,

Ben