[Sidrops] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidrops-rp-06: (with COMMENT)

Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Sat, 28 March 2020 06:20 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-sidrops-rp@ietf.org, sidrops-chairs@ietf.org, sidrops@ietf.org, Nathalie Trenaman <nathalie@ripe.net>
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Murray Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <158537641925.17606.5199067976726721275@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 23:20:19 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidrops/X0nbANdMMoxgw2nAG9xyUixHLtg>
Subject: [Sidrops] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidrops-rp-06: (with COMMENT)

Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-sidrops-rp-06: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sidrops-rp/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Section 4.3:

“A Manifest can be classified as either valid or invalid, and a valid Manifest
is either current and stale.”

That should be “...or stale”, right?

[Sidrops] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draf… Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker
Re: [Sidrops] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on … Di Ma