IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Sidrops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-sidrops-rov-no-rr-01.txt

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Fri, 06 May 2022 22:05 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D98F7C15E419 for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 May 2022 15:05:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6nYNX8aCvhNx for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 May 2022 15:05:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7DB5BC14F734 for <sidrops@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 May 2022 15:05:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.rg.net) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1nn64J-0002I4-PF for sidrops@ietf.org; Fri, 06 May 2022 22:05:00 +0000
Date: Fri, 06 May 2022 15:04:58 -0700
Message-ID: <m2fslmnwqd.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: sidrops@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <165187444339.21170.13445821749382495729@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <165187444339.21170.13445821749382495729@ietfa.amsl.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/26.3 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidrops/h5dMXZfa7lWgzCkLMudIZ6Enj5s>
Subject: Re: [Sidrops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-sidrops-rov-no-rr-01.txt
X-BeenThere: sidrops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: A list for the SIDR Operations WG <sidrops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidrops/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidrops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 May 2022 22:05:08 -0000

> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-sidrops-rov-no-rr-01

the bad news is

   If new RPKI data arrive which invalidate the best path, and the
   router did not keep all alternatives, then it MUST issue a route
   refresh so those alternatives may be evaluated for best path.

randy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email