RE: [Sigtran] SUA implementor's guide
"Haresign Lincoln" <Lincoln.Haresign@comverse.com> Fri, 29 September 2006 17:56 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GTMau-0001yI-MP; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 13:56:16 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GTMat-0001yA-3N for sigtran@ietf.org; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 13:56:15 -0400
Received: from us-wkf-fwmain.comverse.com ([63.64.185.250] helo=us-wkf-interscan1.comverse.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GTMaq-0003Ym-P4 for sigtran@ietf.org; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 13:56:15 -0400
Received: from us-nj-mail1.comverse.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by us-wkf-interscan1.comverse.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k8THu4PO017067; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 13:56:05 -0400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [Sigtran] SUA implementor's guide
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 13:56:03 -0400
Message-ID: <849535E338E99741B7F7413F73253EDB04D21282@us-nj-mail1.comverse.com>
In-Reply-To: <BAA65A575825454CBB0103267553FCCCECFFD8@esebe199.NOE.Nokia.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [Sigtran] SUA implementor's guide
thread-index: Acbj3NRZcM0Cp9xdQFSS+1TrIC0AUgAAXXDAAAAsMBAAAQQTgAADUpEw
From: Haresign Lincoln <Lincoln.Haresign@comverse.com>
To: john.loughney@nokia.com, Lyong@Ciena.com, barryn@adax.com, sigtran@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 3a4bc66230659131057bb68ed51598f8
Cc:
X-BeenThere: sigtran@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Signaling Transport <sigtran.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran>, <mailto:sigtran-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:sigtran@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sigtran-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran>, <mailto:sigtran-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: sigtran-bounces@ietf.org
OK, I assume you are referring to the implementor's guide version 3 that just expired Sept 7. I'll review and provide my feedback. Regards, Lincoln -----Original Message----- From: john.loughney@nokia.com [mailto:john.loughney@nokia.com] Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 12:20 PM To: Haresign Lincoln; Lyong@Ciena.com; barryn@adax.com; sigtran@ietf.org Subject: RE: [Sigtran] SUA implementor's guide Hi all, Lode has the pen at the moment, but if people can read and comment on the current draft, maybe we can see if there is consensus enough to close off the remaining issues and then go for WGLC. John >-----Original Message----- >From: ext Haresign Lincoln [mailto:Lincoln.Haresign@comverse.com] >Sent: 29 September, 2006 18:52 >To: Ong, Lyndon; Barry Nagelberg; sigtran@ietf.org >Subject: RE: [Sigtran] SUA implementor's guide > >I'm interested....there were a number of improvements/clarifications in >the implementors guide. If there's anything I can do to help keep this >up or move it along to RFC, let me know. > >Regards, >Lincoln > >-----Original Message----- >From: Ong, Lyndon [mailto:Lyong@Ciena.com] >Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 11:46 AM >To: Barry Nagelberg; sigtran@ietf.org >Subject: RE: [Sigtran] SUA implementor's guide > >Hi Guys, > >I suspect that Loede and John have been too busy to keep this updated. >Is there still interest in this? > >Cheers, > >Lyndon > >-----Original Message----- >From: Barry Nagelberg [mailto:barryn@adax.com] >Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 8:30 AM >To: sigtran@ietf.org >Subject: RE: [Sigtran] SUA implementor's guide > >Lincoln, > >It has apparently expired and been deleted. It was issued on March 6. > ><snip> >Signalling Transport Working group > L. Coene >Internet-Draft > Siemens >Expires: September 7, 2006 >J. Loughney > > Nokia > >March 6, 2006 > > > SUA Implementor's guide > <draft-ietf-sigtran-sua-implementor-guide-03.txt> ><snip> > >Barry Nagelberg >Adax, Inc. > >-----Original Message----- >From: Haresign Lincoln [mailto:Lincoln.Haresign@comverse.com] >Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 11:16 AM >To: sigtran@ietf.org >Subject: [Sigtran] SUA implementor's guide > > > >Just out of curiosity, what happened to the SUA implementer's guide? > >Was there any intention to update the SUA RFC in a similar manner as >was done to the M3UA RFC? > >Regards, >Lincoln > > > >_______________________________________________ >Sigtran mailing list >Sigtran@ietf.org >https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran > >_______________________________________________ >Sigtran mailing list >Sigtran@ietf.org >https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran > >_______________________________________________ >Sigtran mailing list >Sigtran@ietf.org >https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran > >_______________________________________________ >Sigtran mailing list >Sigtran@ietf.org >https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran > _______________________________________________ Sigtran mailing list Sigtran@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran
- RE: [Sigtran] SUA implementor's guide Ong, Lyndon
- [Sigtran] SUA implementor's guide Haresign Lincoln
- RE: [Sigtran] SUA implementor's guide Barry Nagelberg
- RE: [Sigtran] SUA implementor's guide Haresign Lincoln
- RE: [Sigtran] SUA implementor's guide john.loughney
- RE: [Sigtran] SUA implementor's guide Haresign Lincoln
- RE: [Sigtran] SUA implementor's guide Coene, Lode
- RE: [Sigtran] SUA implementor's guide john.loughney
- Re: [Sigtran] SUA implementor's guide Brian F. G. Bidulock
- Re: [Sigtran] SUA implementor's guide Cullen Jennings
- Re: [Sigtran] SUA implementor's guide Brian F. G. Bidulock
- RE: [Sigtran] SUA implementor's guide Ong, Lyndon
- RE: [Sigtran] SUA implementor's guide Haresign Lincoln
- Re: [Sigtran] SUA implementor's guide Brian F. G. Bidulock
- RE: [Sigtran] SUA implementor's guide Haresign Lincoln
- Re: [Sigtran] SUA implementor's guide Brian F. G. Bidulock
- RE: [Sigtran] SUA implementor's guide john.loughney
- Re: [Sigtran] SUA implementor's guide Brian F. G. Bidulock
- RE: [Sigtran] SUA implementor's guide Haresign Lincoln
- RE: [Sigtran] SUA implementor's guide Haresign Lincoln
- Re: [Sigtran] SUA implementor's guide Brian F. G. Bidulock
- Re: [Sigtran] SUA implementor's guide Brian F. G. Bidulock
- RE: [Sigtran] SUA implementor's guide Haresign Lincoln
- RE: [Sigtran] SUA implementor's guide Barry Nagelberg
- RE: [Sigtran] SUA implementor's guide Haresign Lincoln
- Re: [Sigtran] SUA implementor's guide Brian F. G. Bidulock
- RE: [Sigtran] SUA implementor's guide Coene, Lode
- [Sigtran] RE: TID Label Issues - Issue #1 Haresign Lincoln
- Re: [Sigtran] SUA implementor's guide Brian F. G. Bidulock
- Re: [Sigtran] SUA implementor's guide Brian F. G. Bidulock
- RE: [Sigtran] SUA implementor's guide Haresign Lincoln
- RE: [Sigtran] SUA implementor's guide john.loughney
- RE: [Sigtran] SUA implementor's guide Haresign Lincoln
- Re: [Sigtran] SUA implementor's guide Brian F. G. Bidulock
- [Sigtran] TID Label Issues - Issue #1 Brian F. G. Bidulock
- [Sigtran] TID Label Issues - Issue #2 Brian F. G. Bidulock
- [Sigtran] TID Label Issues - Issue #3 Brian F. G. Bidulock
- [Sigtran] DRN Label Issues -- Issue #1 Brian F. G. Bidulock
- [Sigtran] DRN Label Issues - Issue #2 Brian F. G. Bidulock
- [Sigtran] TID and DRN Label Issues - Issue #1 Brian F. G. Bidulock
- [Sigtran] DRN and TID Label Issues - Issue #2 Brian F. G. Bidulock
- [Sigtran] DRN and TID Label Issues -- Issue #3 Brian F. G. Bidulock
- [Sigtran] DRN and TID Issues - Issue #4 Brian F. G. Bidulock
- [Sigtran] DRN and TID Label Issues - Issue #6 Brian F. G. Bidulock
- [Sigtran] RE: TID Label Issues - Issue #2 Haresign Lincoln
- [Sigtran] DRN and TID Label Issues - Issue #7 Brian F. G. Bidulock
- [Sigtran] RE: TID Label Issues - Issue #3 Haresign Lincoln
- [Sigtran] RE: DRN Label Issues -- Issue #1 Haresign Lincoln
- [Sigtran] RE: DRN Label Issues - Issue #2 Haresign Lincoln
- [Sigtran] RE: TID and DRN Label Issues - Issue #1 Haresign Lincoln
- [Sigtran] DRN and TID Label Issues - Issue #8 Brian F. G. Bidulock
- [Sigtran] Re: TID Label Issues - Issue #1 Brian F. G. Bidulock
- [Sigtran] Re: TID Label Issues - Issue #2 Brian F. G. Bidulock
- [Sigtran] Re: TID Label Issues - Issue #3 Brian F. G. Bidulock
- [Sigtran] Re: DRN Label Issues -- Issue #1 Brian F. G. Bidulock
- [Sigtran] Re: DRN Label Issues - Issue #2 Brian F. G. Bidulock
- [Sigtran] RE: TID Label Issues - Issue #2 Haresign Lincoln
- [Sigtran] Re: TID and DRN Label Issues - Issue #1 Brian F. G. Bidulock
- [Sigtran] Re: TID Label Issues - Issue #1 Brian F. G. Bidulock
- [Sigtran] Re: TID Label Issues - Issue #2 Brian F. G. Bidulock
- [Sigtran] RE: TID Label Issues - Issue #1 Haresign Lincoln
- Re: [Sigtran] DRN and TID Issues - Issue #4 Brian F. G. Bidulock
- [Sigtran] RE: TID Label Issues - Issue #1 Haresign Lincoln
- [Sigtran] Re: DRN and TID Label Issues - Issue #7 Brian F. G. Bidulock
- [Sigtran] RE: TID Label Issues - Issue #3 Haresign Lincoln
- Re: [Sigtran] DRN and TID Label Issues - Issue #8 Brian F. G. Bidulock
- [Sigtran] Re: DRN and TID Label Issues -- Issue #3 Brian F. G. Bidulock
- [Sigtran] DRN and TID Label Issues Brian F. G. Bidulock
- [Sigtran] RE: DRN and TID Label Issues - Issue #5 Haresign Lincoln
- [Sigtran] DRN and TID Label Issues - Issue #5 Brian F. G. Bidulock
- [Sigtran] Re: DRN and TID Label Issues - Issue #2 Brian F. G. Bidulock
- RE: [Sigtran] Re: DRN Label Issues - Issue #2 Haresign Lincoln
- [Sigtran] RE: TID Label Issues - Issue #2 Haresign Lincoln
- RE: [Sigtran] DRN and TID Label Issues - Issue #8 Haresign Lincoln
- [Sigtran] RE: DRN and TID Label Issues - Issue #7 Haresign Lincoln
- [Sigtran] RE: DRN and TID Label Issues - Issue #2 Haresign Lincoln
- [Sigtran] RE: DRN and TID Label Issues -- Issue #3 Haresign Lincoln
- RE: [Sigtran] DRN and TID Issues - Issue #4 Haresign Lincoln
- Re: [Sigtran] Re: DRN Label Issues - Issue #2 Brian F. G. Bidulock
- [Sigtran] RE: DRN and TID Label Issues Haresign Lincoln
- [Sigtran] Re: TID Label Issues - Issue #1 Brian F. G. Bidulock
- RE: [Sigtran] DRN and TID Label Issues - Issue #8 Haresign Lincoln
- [Sigtran] Re: TID Label Issues - Issue #2 Brian F. G. Bidulock
- RE: [Sigtran] Re: DRN Label Issues - Issue #2 Haresign Lincoln
- [Sigtran] Re: DRN and TID Label Issues Brian F. G. Bidulock
- [Sigtran] RE: DRN and TID Label Issues - Issue #2 Haresign Lincoln
- RE: [Sigtran] Re: TID Label Issues - Issue #2 Haresign Lincoln
- Re: [Sigtran] DRN and TID Label Issues - Issue #8 Brian F. G. Bidulock
- Re: [Sigtran] Re: DRN Label Issues - Issue #2 Brian F. G. Bidulock
- RE: [Sigtran] DRN and TID Label Issues - Issue #8 Haresign Lincoln
- RE: [Sigtran] Re: DRN and TID Label Issues Haresign Lincoln
- RE: [Sigtran] Re: DRN Label Issues - Issue #2 Haresign Lincoln
- [Sigtran] Re: DRN and TID Label Issues - Issue #2 Brian F. G. Bidulock
- Re: [Sigtran] Re: TID Label Issues - Issue #2 Brian F. G. Bidulock
- Re: [Sigtran] DRN and TID Label Issues - Issue #8 Brian F. G. Bidulock
- Re: [Sigtran] Re: DRN and TID Label Issues Brian F. G. Bidulock
- Re: [Sigtran] Re: DRN Label Issues - Issue #2 Brian F. G. Bidulock
- [Sigtran] RE: DRN and TID Label Issues -- Issue #3 Haresign Lincoln
- [Sigtran] RE: DRN and TID Label Issues - Issue #7 Haresign Lincoln
- [Sigtran] Re: DRN and TID Label Issues -- Issue #3 Brian F. G. Bidulock
- [Sigtran] RE: DRN and TID Label Issues - Issue #2 Haresign Lincoln
- [Sigtran] Re: DRN and TID Label Issues - Issue #7 Brian F. G. Bidulock
- [Sigtran] Re: DRN and TID Label Issues - Issue #2 Brian F. G. Bidulock
- RE: [Sigtran] Re: DRN and TID Label Issues Haresign Lincoln
- Re: [Sigtran] Re: DRN and TID Label Issues Brian F. G. Bidulock
- [Sigtran] RE: DRN and TID Label Issues -- Issue #3 Haresign Lincoln
- [Sigtran] RE: DRN and TID Label Issues - Issue #7 Haresign Lincoln
- [Sigtran] Re: DRN and TID Label Issues -- Issue #3 Brian F. G. Bidulock
- [Sigtran] Re: DRN and TID Label Issues - Issue #7 Brian F. G. Bidulock
- RE: [Sigtran] Re: DRN and TID Label Issues Haresign Lincoln
- [Sigtran] RE: DRN and TID Label Issues -- Issue #3 Haresign Lincoln
- [Sigtran] Wrong Message Length Field. Aditya
- [Sigtran] Re: Wrong Message Length Field. Brian F. G. Bidulock