RE: [Sigtran] SUA implementor's guide

["Coene, Lode" <[e-mail]>]

Hello all,

WE can already do the WGLC on this version and include any comment
during last call in the updated version.
That would speed up this a little bit...
As far as I know, there are no remaing issues .. But a WGLC has the
canning ability to bring issues back to the front... 

Lyndon, Is it possible to do a WG last call on this version.

Yours sincerely,
Lode

Siemens COM
atealaan 34          2200 Herentals, Belgium
E-mail: [e-mail]
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] 
> Sent: vrijdag 29 september 2006 18:20
> To: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; 
> [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> Subject: RE: [Sigtran] SUA implementor's guide
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Lode has the pen at the moment, but if people can read and comment on
> the
> current draft, maybe we can see if there is consensus enough to close
> off
> the remaining issues and then go for WGLC.
> 
> John 
> 
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: ext Haresign Lincoln [mailto:[e-mail]] 
> >Sent: 29 September, 2006 18:52
> >To: Ong, Lyndon; Barry Nagelberg; [e-mail]
> >Subject: RE: [Sigtran] SUA implementor's guide
> >
> >I'm interested....there were a number of 
> >improvements/clarifications in the implementors guide.  If 
> >there's anything I can do to help keep this up or move it 
> >along to RFC, let me know.
> >
> >Regards,
> >Lincoln 
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Ong, Lyndon [mailto:[e-mail]]
> >Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 11:46 AM
> >To: Barry Nagelberg; [e-mail]
> >Subject: RE: [Sigtran] SUA implementor's guide
> >
> >Hi Guys,
> >
> >I suspect that Loede and John have been too busy to keep 
> this updated.
> >Is there still interest in this?
> >
> >Cheers,
> >
> >Lyndon 
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Barry Nagelberg [mailto:[e-mail]]
> >Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 8:30 AM
> >To: [e-mail]
> >Subject: RE: [Sigtran] SUA implementor's guide
> >
> >Lincoln,
> >
> >It has apparently expired and been deleted. It was issued on March 6.
> >
> ><snip>
> >Signalling Transport Working group                             
> > L. Coene
> >Internet-Draft                                                 
> >  Siemens
> >Expires: September 7, 2006                                   
> >J. Loughney
> >                                                               
> >    Nokia
> >                                                           
> >March 6, 2006
> >
> >
> >                        SUA Implementor's guide
> >           <draft-ietf-sigtran-sua-implementor-guide-03.txt>
> ><snip>
> >
> >Barry Nagelberg
> >Adax, Inc.
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Haresign Lincoln [mailto:[e-mail]]
> >Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 11:16 AM
> >To: [e-mail]
> >Subject: [Sigtran] SUA implementor's guide
> >
> >
> >
> >Just out of curiosity, what happened to the SUA implementer's guide? 
> >
> >Was there any intention to update the SUA RFC in a similar 
> >manner as was done to the M3UA RFC? 
> >
> >Regards,
> >Lincoln 
> >
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Sigtran mailing list
> >[e-mail]
> >https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Sigtran mailing list
> >[e-mail]
> >https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Sigtran mailing list
> >[e-mail]
> >https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Sigtran mailing list
> >[e-mail]
> >https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sigtran mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran
> 

_______________________________________________
Sigtran mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran