Re: [Sigtran] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3331 (1426)
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <bidulock@openss7.org> Fri, 16 May 2008 19:49 UTC
Return-Path: <sigtran-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: sigtran-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-sigtran-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA5A428C274; Fri, 16 May 2008 12:49:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: sigtran@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sigtran@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87A8F28C273; Fri, 16 May 2008 12:49:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NtJ+9t4FIyVZ; Fri, 16 May 2008 12:49:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gw.openss7.com (gw.openss7.com [206.75.119.236]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B54B28C272; Fri, 16 May 2008 12:49:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wilbur.pigworks.openss7.net (IDENT:eog4NMtNus4gO4dA60Hr4nvKkaJRboo5@ns5.evil.openss7.net [192.168.9.5]) by gw.openss7.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m4GJmaXY031941; Fri, 16 May 2008 13:48:36 -0600
Received: from wilbur.pigworks.openss7.net (IDENT:FlNTGSr4k3DuItODpSFdwORoUIhod+Ch@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wilbur.pigworks.openss7.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m4GJmZag024405; Fri, 16 May 2008 13:48:35 -0600
Received: (from brian@localhost) by wilbur.pigworks.openss7.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id m4GJmZrd024404; Fri, 16 May 2008 13:48:35 -0600
Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 13:48:35 -0600
From: "Brian F. G. Bidulock" <bidulock@openss7.org>
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-ID: <20080516194835.GB24123@openss7.org>
Mail-Followup-To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, kmorneau@cisco.com, rdantu@netrake.com, greg@signatustechnologies.com, jheitz@lucent.com, iesg@iesg.org, ah@TR-Sys.de, sigtran@ietf.org
References: <200805161642.m4GGgqse009239@boreas.isi.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200805161642.m4GGgqse009239@boreas.isi.edu>
Organization: http://www.openss7.org/
Dsn-Notification-To: <bidulock@openss7.org>
X-Spam-To: <blockme@openss7.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
Cc: ah@TR-Sys.de, greg@signatustechnologies.com, kmorneau@cisco.com, iesg@iesg.org, jheitz@lucent.com, rdantu@netrake.com, sigtran@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Sigtran] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3331 (1426)
X-BeenThere: sigtran@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: bidulock@openss7.org
List-Id: Signaling Transport <sigtran.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran>, <mailto:sigtran-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/sigtran>
List-Post: <mailto:sigtran@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sigtran-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran>, <mailto:sigtran-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: sigtran-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: sigtran-bounces@ietf.org
RFC, Yes, it is repeated, but the repetition is correct. Please stop sending these. --brian On Fri, 16 May 2008, RFC Errata System wrote: > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC3331, > "Signaling System 7 (SS7) Message Transfer Part 2 (MTP2) - User Adaptation Layer". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > http://www.RFC-Editor.ORG/errata_search.php?rfc=3331&eid=1426 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Technical > Reported by: Alfred Hoenes <ah@TR-Sys.de> > > Section: 3.3.2.6,p.35 > > Original Text > ------------- > The sending node defines the Heartbeat Data field contents. It may > include a Heartbeat Sequence Number and/or time stamp, or other > implementation specific details. > > The receiver of a Heartbeat message does not process this field as it > is only of significance to the sender. The receiver echoes the > content of the Heartbeat Data in a BEAT ACK message. > > > Corrected Text > -------------- > The receiver of a Heartbeat message echoes the content of the > Heartbeat Data field contained therein without further processing > in the Heartbeat Data field of the Heartbeat Ack message. > > > Notes > ----- > Apparently, the quoted text has been copied from 3.3.2.5 without > performing the appropriate rewording to accommodate the context > of 3.3.2.6 (BEAT ACK message). > > Instructions: > ------------- > This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC3331 (draft-ietf-sigtran-m2ua-15) > -------------------------------------- > Title : Signaling System 7 (SS7) Message Transfer Part 2 (MTP2) - User Adaptation Layer > Publication Date : September 2002 > Author(s) : K. Morneault, R. Dantu, G. Sidebottom, B. Bidulock, J. Heitz > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > Source : Legacy > Area : Legacy > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG -- Brian F. G. Bidulock ¦ The reasonable man adapts himself to the ¦ bidulock@openss7.org ¦ world; the unreasonable one persists in ¦ http://www.openss7.org/ ¦ trying to adapt the world to himself. ¦ ¦ Therefore all progress depends on the ¦ ¦ unreasonable man. -- George Bernard Shaw ¦ _______________________________________________ Sigtran mailing list Sigtran@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran
- Re: [Sigtran] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3331… Brian F. G. Bidulock