Re: [Simple] draft-ietf-simple-msrp-cema-05 WGLC comments - Section 7 (Ben)

Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Fri, 01 June 2012 21:18 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: simple@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: simple@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8256321F87EE for <simple@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 14:18:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.035
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.035 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.564, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VMoBAZPs3wli for <simple@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 14:18:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (shaman.nostrum.com [72.232.179.90]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D7D621F87F1 for <simple@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 14:18:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dn3-123.estacado.net (vicuna-alt.estacado.net [75.53.54.121]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q51LH3mf088645 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 1 Jun 2012 16:17:06 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <FB83E5CB-6006-4B41-984C-17A3FA51CE3E@standardstrack.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 16:17:03 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <92724ABE-44E0-419F-A4CF-1C4EFA1AD5AA@nostrum.com>
References: <7F2072F1E0DE894DA4B517B93C6A05852C444A0CFA@ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se> <7B321302-CDFC-4966-9928-CCB202E33AAC@nostrum.com> <7F2072F1E0DE894DA4B517B93C6A05852C459128EE@ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se> <8B33C1AA-3B30-413B-834C-2BFFF152E79D@nostrum.com> <FB83E5CB-6006-4B41-984C-17A3FA51CE3E@standardstrack.com>
To: Eric Burger <eburger@standardstrack.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278)
Received-SPF: pass (nostrum.com: 75.53.54.121 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism)
Cc: Simple WG <simple@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Simple] draft-ietf-simple-msrp-cema-05 WGLC comments - Section 7 (Ben)
X-BeenThere: simple@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP for Instant Messaging and Presence Leveraging Extensions <simple.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/simple>, <mailto:simple-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/simple>
List-Post: <mailto:simple@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:simple-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple>, <mailto:simple-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 21:18:23 -0000

On Jun 1, 2012, at 5:47 AM, Eric Burger wrote:

> But, without CEMA you have  no possibility  of end-to-end encryption. At least with CEMA you have the possibility.
> 

Do you mean that statement in general, or in the case of MSRP traversing media-steering middleboxes? I agree with the later, but not the former.

[...]