IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Simple] draft-ietf-simple-msrp-cema-05 WGLC comments - Section 7 (Ben)

Eric Burger <eburger@standardstrack.com> Fri, 01 June 2012 21:21 UTC

Return-Path: <eburger@standardstrack.com>
X-Original-To: simple@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: simple@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 962D621F889A for <simple@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 14:21:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.949
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.949 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.650, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k4Cxhvo0E8PG for <simple@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 14:21:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from biz104.inmotionhosting.com (biz104.inmotionhosting.com [173.247.254.120]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5088A21F88AB for <simple@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 14:21:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ip68-100-199-8.dc.dc.cox.net ([68.100.199.8]:63488 helo=[192.168.15.135]) by biz104.inmotionhosting.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <eburger@standardstrack.com>) id 1SaZI7-0001RW-9J; Fri, 01 Jun 2012 14:21:51 -0700
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail-224--498817543"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"
From: Eric Burger <eburger@standardstrack.com>
In-Reply-To: <92724ABE-44E0-419F-A4CF-1C4EFA1AD5AA@nostrum.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 17:20:35 -0400
Message-Id: <03A6F766-2C9B-48E3-B703-B198193FFE4C@standardstrack.com>
References: <7F2072F1E0DE894DA4B517B93C6A05852C444A0CFA@ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se> <7B321302-CDFC-4966-9928-CCB202E33AAC@nostrum.com> <7F2072F1E0DE894DA4B517B93C6A05852C459128EE@ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se> <8B33C1AA-3B30-413B-834C-2BFFF152E79D@nostrum.com> <FB83E5CB-6006-4B41-984C-17A3FA51CE3E@standardstrack.com> <92724ABE-44E0-419F-A4CF-1C4EFA1AD5AA@nostrum.com>
To: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - biz104.inmotionhosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - standardstrack.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
Cc: Simple WG <simple@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Simple] draft-ietf-simple-msrp-cema-05 WGLC comments - Section 7 (Ben)
X-BeenThere: simple@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP for Instant Messaging and Presence Leveraging Extensions <simple.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/simple>, <mailto:simple-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/simple>
List-Post: <mailto:simple@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:simple-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple>, <mailto:simple-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 21:21:58 -0000

The latter. As you and others have pointed out, there's nothing we can do with relays that by definition have to read the plaintext of the message.

On Jun 1, 2012, at 5:17 PM, Ben Campbell wrote:

> 
> On Jun 1, 2012, at 5:47 AM, Eric Burger wrote:
> 
>> But, without CEMA you have  no possibility  of end-to-end encryption. At least with CEMA you have the possibility.
>> 
> 
> Do you mean that statement in general, or in the case of MSRP traversing media-steering middleboxes? I agree with the later, but not the former.
> 
> [...]
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email