Re: [Simple] updated SIP-XMPP gatewaying specs
Raphael Bossek <raphael.bossek@estos.de> Wed, 17 October 2012 07:14 UTC
Return-Path: <raphael.bossek@estos.de>
X-Original-To: simple@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: simple@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3652121F8789 for <simple@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Oct 2012 00:14:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.051
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.051 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, MANGLED_LOAN=2.3]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IRpgVNu3O41R for <simple@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Oct 2012 00:14:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.estos.de (ns1.estos24.de [62.245.228.210]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7184D21F86BA for <simple@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Oct 2012 00:14:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hermelin.estos.de ([fe80::1]) by hermelin.estos.de ([fe80::1%1]) with mapi; Wed, 17 Oct 2012 09:14:32 +0200
From: Raphael Bossek <raphael.bossek@estos.de>
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>, "simple@ietf.org" <simple@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 09:14:30 +0200
Thread-Topic: [Simple] updated SIP-XMPP gatewaying specs
Thread-Index: Ac2rsFTGBZ5jLL13QlSwDkPIxEbv+AAhqX4A
Message-ID: <9B7CB52192C7EA4C931088F28A51177C0131381F5030@hermelin.estos.de>
References: <507D78C6.1040103@stpeter.im>
In-Reply-To: <507D78C6.1040103@stpeter.im>
Accept-Language: de-DE
Content-Language: de-DE
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: de-DE
x-pp-processed: __PP2__3d782474-723b-4e9b-a051-a45da57f7129
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: David Welzmiller <david.welzmiller@estos.de>
Subject: Re: [Simple] updated SIP-XMPP gatewaying specs
X-BeenThere: simple@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP for Instant Messaging and Presence Leveraging Extensions <simple.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/simple>, <mailto:simple-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/simple>
List-Post: <mailto:simple@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:simple-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple>, <mailto:simple-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 07:14:39 -0000
Hallo Philipp, kennst du den Peter Saint-Andre? Sind "seine" Ideen obsolate? Gruß, i.A. Raphael Bossek Product Manager ESTOS GmbH Petersbrunner Str. 3a 82319 Starnberg, Germany Phone: +49815136856153 Fax: +49 (8151) 36856-853 Mobile: +49 (151) 59177535 Email: raphael.bossek@estos.de Web: http://www.estos.de // Jetzt anmelden zu den kostenfreien Online-Workshops ab September 2012. Webinare zu den Themen: Mobilität, DATEV pro, Federation, u. a. http://www.estos.de/partner/webinare.html --- ESTOS GmbH Registered office: Starnberg, Germany Commercial registry Munich, HRB 133 670 Managing Directors: Dipl.-Phys. Stephan Eckbauer, Dipl.-Ing. Stefan Hobratschk, Ing. Christoph Lösch, Florian Bock -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: simple-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:simple-bounces@ietf.org] Im Auftrag von Peter Saint-Andre Gesendet: Dienstag, 16. Oktober 2012 17:10 An: simple@ietf.org Betreff: [Simple] updated SIP-XMPP gatewaying specs -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Last night I refreshed the following specifications covering protocol mappings between SIP and XMPP for addresses and errors, presence, single messages, one-to-one chat sessions, and multi-user chat... https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-saintandre-sip-xmpp-core https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-saintandre-sip-xmpp-presence https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-saintandre-sip-xmpp-im https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-saintandre-sip-xmpp-chat https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-saintandre-sip-xmpp-groupchat These specs have been around in one form or another for years. More recently, a number of people have asked me whether they can be finished off and published as RFCs. I think they can, although the specs farther down the list are a bit less mature and need to be aligned with work on MSRP and SIMPLE-based chat. I've received feedback offlist in the last few months about several of these (especially the groupchat spec), which I have not yet incorporated, but I will endeavor to do that soon. Thanks for listening, Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlB9eMYACgkQNL8k5A2w/vwkbwCePKpOCnpzEEuqo51Vbii1UV/W SLMAn35Y/YFR9djqcQ+PCOO385B0EXjT =mdvB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Simple mailing list Simple@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple
- [Simple] updated SIP-XMPP gatewaying specs Peter Saint-Andre
- [Simple] Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replaced, … Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [Simple] Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replac… Mary Barnes
- Re: [Simple] updated SIP-XMPP gatewaying specs Adrian Georgescu
- Re: [Simple] updated SIP-XMPP gatewaying specs Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [Simple] Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replac… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [Simple] Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replac… Ben Campbell
- Re: [Simple] Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replac… Ben Campbell
- Re: [Simple] Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replac… Ben Campbell
- Re: [Simple] Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replac… Mary Barnes
- Re: [Simple] Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replac… Ben Campbell
- Re: [Simple] Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replac… Mary Barnes
- Re: [Simple] updated SIP-XMPP gatewaying specs Raphael Bossek
- Re: [Simple] Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replac… Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [Simple] Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replac… Avshalom Houri
- Re: [Simple] Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replac… Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [Simple] Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replac… Avshalom Houri
- Re: [Simple] Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replac… Olle E. Johansson
- Re: [Simple] Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replac… Ben Campbell
- Re: [Simple] Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replac… Ben Campbell
- Re: [Simple] Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replac… Roy, Radhika R CIV (US)
- Re: [Simple] Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replac… Adrian Georgescu
- Re: [Simple] Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replac… Olle E. Johansson
- Re: [Simple] Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replac… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [Simple] Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replac… Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [Simple] Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replac… Ben Campbell
- Re: [Simple] Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replac… Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [Simple] Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replac… Olle E. Johansson
- Re: [Simple] Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replac… Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [Simple] Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replac… Olle E. Johansson
- Re: [Simple] Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replac… Saúl Ibarra Corretgé
- Re: [Simple] Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replac… Saúl Ibarra Corretgé