Re: [Simple] updated SIP-XMPP gatewaying specs
Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Tue, 16 October 2012 17:55 UTC
Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: simple@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: simple@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E309321F89D6 for <simple@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 10:55:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.635
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.635 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.036, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TJ1Jf8baHIIj for <simple@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 10:55:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B3B221F89D3 for <simple@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 10:55:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.5] (unknown [71.237.13.154]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 95C3F4010C; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 11:57:38 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <507D9F74.8020902@stpeter.im>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 11:55:00 -0600
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121010 Thunderbird/16.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Adrian Georgescu <ag@ag-projects.com>
References: <507D78C6.1040103@stpeter.im> <DF41C05D-23CF-4CBD-B3E2-21897E0C3359@ag-projects.com>
In-Reply-To: <DF41C05D-23CF-4CBD-B3E2-21897E0C3359@ag-projects.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "simple@ietf.org" <simple@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Simple] updated SIP-XMPP gatewaying specs
X-BeenThere: simple@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP for Instant Messaging and Presence Leveraging Extensions <simple.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/simple>, <mailto:simple-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/simple>
List-Post: <mailto:simple@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:simple-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple>, <mailto:simple-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 17:55:05 -0000
Thanks, Adrian. I still need to incorporate the feedback you sent me a few months ago. Will do soon. On 10/16/12 11:49 AM, Adrian Georgescu wrote: > This is great work, Peter! > > Adrian > > On Oct 16, 2012, at 5:09 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > > Last night I refreshed the following specifications covering protocol > mappings between SIP and XMPP for addresses and errors, presence, > single messages, one-to-one chat sessions, and multi-user chat... > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-saintandre-sip-xmpp-core > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-saintandre-sip-xmpp-presence > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-saintandre-sip-xmpp-im > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-saintandre-sip-xmpp-chat > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-saintandre-sip-xmpp-groupchat > > These specs have been around in one form or another for years. More > recently, a number of people have asked me whether they can be > finished off and published as RFCs. I think they can, although the > specs farther down the list are a bit less mature and need to be > aligned with work on MSRP and SIMPLE-based chat. I've received > feedback offlist in the last few months about several of these > (especially the groupchat spec), which I have not yet incorporated, > but I will endeavor to do that soon. > > Thanks for listening, > > Peter >
- [Simple] updated SIP-XMPP gatewaying specs Peter Saint-Andre
- [Simple] Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replaced, … Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [Simple] Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replac… Mary Barnes
- Re: [Simple] updated SIP-XMPP gatewaying specs Adrian Georgescu
- Re: [Simple] updated SIP-XMPP gatewaying specs Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [Simple] Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replac… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [Simple] Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replac… Ben Campbell
- Re: [Simple] Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replac… Ben Campbell
- Re: [Simple] Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replac… Ben Campbell
- Re: [Simple] Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replac… Mary Barnes
- Re: [Simple] Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replac… Ben Campbell
- Re: [Simple] Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replac… Mary Barnes
- Re: [Simple] updated SIP-XMPP gatewaying specs Raphael Bossek
- Re: [Simple] Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replac… Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [Simple] Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replac… Avshalom Houri
- Re: [Simple] Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replac… Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [Simple] Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replac… Avshalom Houri
- Re: [Simple] Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replac… Olle E. Johansson
- Re: [Simple] Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replac… Ben Campbell
- Re: [Simple] Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replac… Ben Campbell
- Re: [Simple] Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replac… Roy, Radhika R CIV (US)
- Re: [Simple] Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replac… Adrian Georgescu
- Re: [Simple] Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replac… Olle E. Johansson
- Re: [Simple] Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replac… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [Simple] Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replac… Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [Simple] Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replac… Ben Campbell
- Re: [Simple] Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replac… Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [Simple] Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replac… Olle E. Johansson
- Re: [Simple] Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replac… Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [Simple] Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replac… Olle E. Johansson
- Re: [Simple] Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replac… Saúl Ibarra Corretgé
- Re: [Simple] Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replac… Saúl Ibarra Corretgé