Re: [Simple] Adding a telephone number to a basic PIDF document

Tim,

I wouldn't do it the way you propose.

I would simply add an extra <tuple> with a <contact> containing the 
telephone number as a tel: uri. You can also identify it as a different 
device if you wish. I believe you may do that as a deviceID in the tuple 
*without* also including <device>.

But I am confused about your intent. It looks like you intend to have 
one tuple even without the phone number. (Since you are from MS I am 
pretty sure you must plan to have a PC in here.) But then I am confused 
because your tuple is open but has no contact - so it isn't *very* open.

If my assumption is right, I would expect something like:

<presence xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf" 
xmlns:ep="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:status:rpid-status" 
xmlns:et="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:rpid-tuple"

xmlns:ci="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:cipid" 
xmlns:dm="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:data-model" entity="sip:foo@bar.com">
   <tuple id="0">
     <status>
       <basic>closed</basic>
       <ep:activities>
         <ep:activity>away</ep:activity>
       </ep:activities>
     </status>
     <dm:deviceID>your-pc</dm:deviceID>
   </tuple>
   <tuple id="1">
     <status>
       <basic>open</basic>
       <ep:activities>
         <ep:activity>away</ep:activity>
       </ep:activities>
     </status>
     <contact>tel:+4255551234</contact>
     <dm:deviceID>tel:+4255551234</dm:deviceID>
   </tuple>
</presence>

You could of course put in <device> as well if you want, but I don't see 
any need here.

	Paul

Tim Rang wrote:
> My apologies if I have addressed this to the wrong alias, but I am 
> having a PIDF problem which I need help with.  My goal is to add a user 
> specified phone number to an existing PIDF document format.  I do not 
> wish to make a SIP endpoint available for A/V calls, just to tell people 
> how to dial my PSTN number.  My starting point is a basic PIDF document 
> like the following-
> 
>  
> 
> <presence xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf" 
> xmlns:ep="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:status:rpid-status" 
> xmlns:et="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:rpid-tuple"
> 
> xmlns:ci="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:cipid" entity="sip:foo@bar.com">
> 
>   <tuple id="0">
> 
>     <status>
> 
>       <basic>open</basic>
> 
>       <ep:activities>
> 
>         <ep:activity>away</ep:activity>
> 
>       </ep:activities>
> 
>     </status>
> 
>   </tuple>
> 
>   <ci:display-name>Foo Bar</ci:display-name>
> 
> </presence>
> 
>  
> 
> Excluding the option of vcard, I assume that I need to add this phone as 
> a device.  So I add a device tuple.  Since I have nothing more reliable 
> to use than the telephone number, it is used in both the id attribute 
> and the deviceID element.  Draft-ietf-simple-presence-data-model-05 
> doesn’t state explicitly as far as I can tell, but reading between the 
> lines I don’t think I can have a device without an associated deviceID 
> element pointing to it from a service.  I also assume that the ‘note’ 
> element for device is interpreted differently from a note for person or 
> under the ‘presence’ root so that the note is merely a descriptor of the 
> device.  I only assume this because I don’t see a better candidate for 
> describing the device.  Assuming that, my original document is modified 
> as follows-
> 
>  
> 
> <presence xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf" 
> xmlns:ep="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:status:rpid-status" 
> xmlns:et="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:rpid-tuple"
> 
> xmlns:ci="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:cipid" *xmlns:dm="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:data-model"* entity="sip:foo@bar.com">
> 
>   <tuple id="0">
> 
>     <status>
> 
>       <basic>open</basic>
> 
>       <ep:activities>
> 
>         <ep:activity>away</ep:activity>
> 
>       </ep:activities>
> 
>     </status>
> 
> *  <dm:deviceID>tel:+4255551234</dm:deviceID>*
> 
>  </tuple>**
> 
>   <ci:display-name>Foo Bar</ci:display-name>
> 
>  *<dm:device id="4255551234">*
> 
> *   <dm:deviceID>urn:tel:+4255551234</dm:deviceID>*
> 
> *   <dm:note>Home Phone</dm:note>*
> 
> * </dm:device>*
> 
> </presence>
> 
>  
> 
> Is this how other folks are implementing this?
> 
>  
> 
> Thanks for your feedback,
> 
> Tim Rang
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Simple mailing list
> Simple@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple

_______________________________________________
Simple mailing list
Simple@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple