[sip-clf] FW: New Version Notification for draft-niccolini-sipclf-ipfix-02

["Saverio Niccolini" <[e-mail]>]

Dear all,

we just submitted a new version of the draft (now available at
http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-niccolini-sipclf-ipfix-02.txt).

This version improves the example where we used a real private 
enterprise (PEN) number 35566 (which is controlled by one of 
the authors of the draft).

We also added a list of open points that we think should be 
addressed in future version of the draft.

Before moving into addressing those, we would appreciate feedback
to the example that was explicitly requested by the WG and the AD.

Thanks,
Saverio

============================================================
Dr. Saverio Niccolini
Manager, Real-Time Communications Group
NEC Laboratories Europe, Network Research Division     
Kurfuerstenanlage 36, D-69115 Heidelberg
Tel.     [phone]
Fax:     [phone]
e-mail:  [e-mail]
============================================================
NEC Europe Limited Registered Office: NEC House, 1 Victoria
Road, London W3 6BL Registered in England 2832014

  


> -----Original Message-----
> From: IETF I-D Submission Tool [mailto:[e-mail]]
> Sent: 19 April 2010 16:26
> To: Saverio Niccolini
> Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail];
> [e-mail]
> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-niccolini-sipclf-ipfix-02
> 
> 
> A new version of I-D, draft-niccolini-sipclf-ipfix-02.txt has been
> successfully submitted by Saverio Niccolini and posted to the IETF
> repository.
> 
> Filename:	 draft-niccolini-sipclf-ipfix
> Revision:	 02
> Title:		 Advantages of using an IPFIX File Format for SIPCLF
> Creation_date:	 2010-04-19
> WG ID:		 Independent Submission
> Number_of_pages: 16
> 
> Abstract:
> The SIPCLF WG is currently trying to identify file format(s) suitable
> for its scope as defined in the current charter.  The group has so
> far received proposals for a text format and an indexed-text format
> that are going to be soon combined.  Several people believe that
> IPFIX could be a valid alternative to these two proposals for several
> reasons detailed in this document.
> 
> This document discusses the main advantages related to the usage of
> IPFIX file format for SIPCLF.  Additionally it gives preliminary
> indications on the basic set of information elements that would need
> to be defined by the SIPCLF WG.
> 
> 
> 
> The IETF Secretariat.
>