[sip-clf] sipclf-indexed-ascii-01 released

Gonzalo Salgueiro <gsalguei@cisco.com> Sat, 10 July 2010 22:54 UTC

Return-Path: <gsalguei@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: sip-clf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sip-clf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA3413A68E8 for <sip-clf@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Jul 2010 15:54:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.109
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.109 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-1.11, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b5GqzWTBCAJ9 for <sip-clf@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Jul 2010 15:54:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from av-tac-rtp.cisco.com (hen.cisco.com [64.102.19.198]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB4BC3A68E3 for <sip-clf@ietf.org>; Sat, 10 Jul 2010 15:54:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-TACSUNS: Virus Scanned
Received: from rooster.cisco.com (localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by av-tac-rtp.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o6AMsWRY001053; Sat, 10 Jul 2010 18:54:41 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from rtp-gsalguei-8716.cisco.com (rtp-gsalguei-8716.cisco.com [10.116.61.55]) by rooster.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o6AMsSZk013293; Sat, 10 Jul 2010 18:54:28 -0400 (EDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-50--152442020"
From: Gonzalo Salgueiro <gsalguei@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <F3E8D666-0879-4093-AEE8-5A7E4EA0582F@cisco.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2010 18:54:28 -0400
Message-Id: <AFB5D7F5-3994-48A7-B1CC-A3480AF35394@cisco.com>
References: <4C2A348F.4040900@bell-labs.com> <F3E8D666-0879-4093-AEE8-5A7E4EA0582F@cisco.com>
To: sip-clf@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
Subject: [sip-clf] sipclf-indexed-ascii-01 released
X-BeenThere: sip-clf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Common Log File format discussion list <sip-clf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-clf>, <mailto:sip-clf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip-clf>
List-Post: <mailto:sip-clf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sip-clf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-clf>, <mailto:sip-clf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2010 22:54:38 -0000

All - 

I have uploaded the -01 version of the indexed-ASCII draft. 

This primary addition to this version is the addition of an Example Record section.

The -01 version is available at:

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-salgueiro-sipclf-indexed-ascii-01.txt

Regards,

Gonzalo


On Jun 29, 2010, at 7:10 PM, Gonzalo Salgueiro wrote:

> All - 
> 
> I have uploaded the initial version of the indexed-ASCII implementation draft. 
> This draft attempts to line up with the data model proposed in the SIPCLF Problem Statement draft.
> 
> Please note that this work was expedited in an attempt to get this draft submitted prior to the -00 draft cutoff deadline.
> I intend to add a section with an example record using the syntax proposed in the draft. 
> 
> The -00 version is available at:
> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-salgueiro-sipclf-indexed-ascii-00.txt
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Gonzalo
> 
> On Jun 29, 2010, at 1:59 PM, Vijay K. Gurbani wrote:
> 
>> All: Based on the comments in the list discussion [1], I
>> have released a new version of the sipclf problem-statement.
>> 
>> The editor of the indexed-ASCII draft will be releasing an
>> initial version of the indexed-ASCII draft shortly using the
>> data model in the problem-statement.  I would like to draw
>> the attention of the IPFIX community to the data model
>> section of the sipclf-problem-statement draft so they can
>> produce a comparable draft for IPFIX as well.
>> 
>> The following are highlights of the changes in -03:
>> 
>> 1) Each SIP CLF line has the same canonical format (see
>> S8 of the draft.)
>> 
>> 2) Added a table (Table 1) that outlines how the mandatory
>> fields are logged by SIP entities.
>> 
>> 3) Added record length, type of message (request or response)
>> and directionality (send or receive) to the SIP CLF record.
>> 
>> 4) Various nits found by Peter Musgrave.
>> 
>> Peter had indicated that he would like to include a discussion
>> of message sizes in the document.  This version does not include
>> message size discussion (as yet.)
>> 
>> The -03 version is available at:
>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sipclf-problem-statement-03.txt
>> 
>> A diff between -02 and -03 is at the following URL:
>> http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-sipclf-problem-statement-03.txt
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> [1] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip-clf/current/msg00181.html
>> 
>> - vijay
>> -- 
>> Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
>> 1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60566 (USA)
>> Email: vkg@{alcatel-lucent.com,bell-labs.com,acm.org}
>> Web:   http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/
>> _______________________________________________
>> sip-clf mailing list
>> sip-clf@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-clf
>