IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sip-clf] conflict SIPCLF -> OPSAREA

Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com> Sun, 07 November 2010 06:23 UTC

Return-Path: <fluffy@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: sip-clf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sip-clf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE9BF3A69C2 for <sip-clf@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 23:23:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.562
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.562 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.038, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S-fIRuVRF1wT for <sip-clf@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 23:23:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-6.cisco.com (sj-iport-6.cisco.com [171.71.176.117]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DA0F3A69C1 for <sip-clf@ietf.org>; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 23:23:10 -0700 (PDT)
Authentication-Results: sj-iport-6.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.58,309,1286150400"; d="scan'208";a="615869396"
Received: from sj-core-5.cisco.com ([171.71.177.238]) by sj-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 07 Nov 2010 06:23:27 +0000
Received: from [192.168.4.2] (rcdn-fluffy-8711.cisco.com [10.99.9.18]) by sj-core-5.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oA76NQ5F016141; Sun, 7 Nov 2010 06:23:26 GMT
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <4CD3E838.60705@cisco.com>
Date: Sun, 07 Nov 2010 00:23:44 -0600
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <AF1C548F-4541-4289-8039-C3C504FA792C@cisco.com>
References: <4CD3E838.60705@cisco.com>
To: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>, sipclf-ads@tools.ietf.org, sipclf-chairs@tools.ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
Cc: SIP-CLF Mailing List <sip-clf@ietf.org>, Saverio Niccolini <Saverio.Niccolini@nw.neclab.eu>, Hadriel Kaplan <HKaplan@acmepacket.com>
Subject: Re: [sip-clf] conflict SIPCLF -> OPSAREA
X-BeenThere: sip-clf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Common Log File format discussion list <sip-clf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-clf>, <mailto:sip-clf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip-clf>
List-Post: <mailto:sip-clf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sip-clf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-clf>, <mailto:sip-clf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Nov 2010 06:23:10 -0000

Is there any chance we might be able to resolve this conflict by moving SIP-CLF. I realize how late it is to move things but it's been done before and this group was so OPs related it almost got created in the OPs area. Not having the Ops people attend, particular Benoit, seem like a serious impediment to making progress given the agenda. 


On Nov 5, 2010, at 5:19 AM, Benoit Claise wrote:

> Dear all,
> 
> I realized that there is a conflict in the agenda: SIPCLF -> OPSAREA, since SIPCLF was "Moved from Friday morning session I 0900-1130"
> I have to chose OPSAREA.
> For future meetings, we should avoid the conflict with some OPS related activities ... most importantly if IPFIX is selected as the protocol.
> 
> Regards, Benoit.
> _______________________________________________
> sip-clf mailing list
> sip-clf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-clf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email