Re: [sip-overload] draft minutes IETF83

["Vijay K. Gurbani" <[e-mail]>]

On 04/21/2012 08:21 PM, Ravindran, Parthasarathi wrote:
> Salvatore,
>
> I have provided the comment on ietf-soc-overload-control-08 that
> subscribe/notify mechanism mentioned in the draft has to updated with
> proper detail mechanism or the section to be removed and Vijay agrees
> to update the draft with the proper text in the next revision. Please
> update in the minutes.

Partha: I promised to get back to the list with proposed modifications
to S9.1.2 based on your feedback at the mic during the meeting.  So,
here goes.

I believe you are pointing out an incongruity in the text in S9, which
discusses two alternatives to providing overload control --- one is by
sending the feedback in the Via header (the chosen means) and the second
is through a subs/not event package.  The incongruity occurs because the
phrasing of the text in the subs/not alternative appears to imply that
subs/not is supported mechanism as well, which clearly it is not.

To remedy this, I propose that we simply remove Section 9 in its 
entirety.  The justification for choosing the Via header is already
provided in Section 3, as such Section 9 does not contribute much.
The subs/not package is used in a different scenario (as described
by Shen et al. [1]).  Having the discussion on subs/not in the
overload-control document may simply be distracting.

Let me know if that is okay with you and I will remove Section 9 in
the next revision.

[1] 
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-soc-load-control-event-package/

Thanks,

- vijay
-- 
Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60563 (USA)
Email: vkg@{bell-labs.com,acm.org} / [e-mail]
Web:   http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/