RE: [Sip] Editorial question on MIME example

Hi, 

>>>I guess you're saying SIP should have used something like "Length:" 
>>>instead of "Content-Length:" to avoid collision with MIME's 
>>>self-claimed ownership of all field names that begin with "Content-"?
>> 
>>No no.
>> 
>>I am not talking about the usage of Content-Lenght (or any other
>>Content- header) in the SIP part of the message. I was referring to 
>>the usage of Content-Length in the MIME part of the message body.
> 
>Ah - thanks for clarifying.  So you are referring to the 
>second Content-Length field in the example at 
>http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3261#page-212 -- the 
>Content-Length field with the value 231. 

Yes.

>I agree it shouldn't be in that example.  Looks like something to add
to 
>the Essential Corrections.

Ok.

Thanks!

Regards,

Christer

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip