Re: SIP bakeoff registration now open

Francois Menard List Account <fm-listproc@fmmo.ca> Sun, 05 March 2000 20:37 UTC

Received: from lists.research.bell-labs.com (paperless.dnrc.bell-labs.com [135.180.161.172]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA11182 for <sip-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Sun, 5 Mar 2000 15:37:48 -0500 (EST)
Received: by lists.research.bell-labs.com (Postfix) id 27ACC52DA; Sun, 5 Mar 2000 15:35:23 -0500 (EST)
Delivered-To: sip-outgoing-local@paperless.dnrc.bell-labs.com
Received: by lists.research.bell-labs.com (Postfix, from userid 20006) id 8CDFB52DD; Sun, 5 Mar 2000 15:35:22 -0500 (EST)
Delivered-To: sip-local@paperless.dnrc.bell-labs.com
Received: from grubby.research.bell-labs.com (guard.research.bell-labs.com [135.104.2.9]) by lists.research.bell-labs.com (Postfix) with SMTP id DC5D552DA for <sip@lists.research.bell-labs.com>; Sun, 5 Mar 2000 15:35:04 -0500 (EST)
Received: from dusty.research.bell-labs.com ([135.104.2.7]) by grubby; Sun Mar 5 15:34:26 EST 2000
Received: from ns.fmmo.ca ([207.253.160.156]) by dusty; Sun Mar 5 15:31:52 EST 2000
Received: from localhost (fm-listproc@localhost) by ns.fmmo.ca (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA08354; Sun, 5 Mar 2000 15:37:42 -0500
Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2000 15:37:42 -0500
From: Francois Menard List Account <fm-listproc@fmmo.ca>
To: Colin Perkins <C.Perkins@cs.ucl.ac.uk>
Cc: Henning Schulzrinne <schulzrinne@cs.columbia.edu>, sip@lists.research.bell-labs.com, Terri Cali <Terri_Cali@mw.3com.com>
Subject: Re: SIP bakeoff registration now open
In-Reply-To: <5215.952017325@cs.ucl.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.20.0003051537230.8105-100000@ns.fmmo.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Sender: owner-sip@lists.research.bell-labs.com
Precedence: bulk

Would that also include RTCP compatibility tests ?

-=Francois=-


On Thu, 2 Mar 2000, Colin Perkins wrote:

> --> Henning Schulzrinne writes:
> >http://www.sipbakeoff.org/4/ has details. Please contact Terri Cali
> >(cc'ed) with any questions.
> >
> >I look forward to seeing many of you at the bake-off. 
> >
> >I'd also appreciate feedback on whether and to what extent we should
> >test more formally for RTP interoperability at this event. This has
> >become an issue as we cannot progress RTP to draft status without more
> >implementations that comply. Since a phone that only rings but doesn't
> >"talk" is of somewhat limited use, this might be of some interest. (This
> >would obviously only affect UAs, not servers.)
> 
> I'd strongly support moves to perform RTP interoperability testing at the
> SIP bakeoff. The AVT working group has produced a number of internet drafts
> listing those features which would need to be tested and suggesting testing 
> procedures:
> 
> 	draft-ietf-avt-rtp-interop-02.txt
> 	draft-ietf-avt-profile-interop-00.txt
> 	draft-ietf-avt-rtptest-02.txt
> 
> And as Henning says, this demonstration must be completed before the revised 
> RTP specification can become an RFC. 
> 
> I would also encourage vendors who have performed in-house interoperability
> testing of RTP implementations to consider making this information available
> to the AVT working group chairs, so we can complete the interoperability
> requirements (we're aware that some vendors have concerns with making this
> available - contact us, and we can work to address them).
> 
> Colin
>