Re: [Sip] Requirements on Reason information. New I-D

[Henning Schulzrinne <[e-mail]>]

Thanks for putting this together. I'm not sure MUST/SHOULD are
appropriate for requirements drafts, but this is presumably not meant
for RFC publication, so it probably doesn't matter.

Gonzalo Camarillo wrote:
> 
> Chairmen,
> 
> I presented the Reason header field draft today in the SIP WG meeting:
> http://search.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-schulzrinne-sip-reason-01.txt
> 
> Some folks considered that the requirements for this work were not clear
> enough, so I was asked by the chairmen to write a set of requirements.
> We agreed that there was no need to wait for the next IETF meeting in
> order to progress such a requirements draft. Discussions in the mailing
> list were encouraged.
> 
> I have put together an I-D with those requirements.
> 
> http://standards.ericsson.net/gonzalo/draft-camarillo-sipping-reason-00.txt
> 
> I would like to know if these requirements are what you expected or if,
> on the other hand, you wanted something else...
> 
> I intend to submit this draft, including the comments I may receive, on
> Monday.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Gonzalo
> --
> Gonzalo Camarillo                    Phone :   [phone]
> Columbia University                  Mobile:  [phone]
> 472 Computer Science Building        Fax   :  [phone]
> 1214 Amsterdam Ave., Mail Code 0401  http://www.hut.fi/~gonzalo
> New York, NY 10027
> USA                              [e-mail]
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
> This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
> Use [e-mail] for questions on current sip
> Use [e-mail] for new developments on the application of sip

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [e-mail] for questions on current sip
Use [e-mail] for new developments on the application of sip