Re: [Sip] questions about drat-bjorkner-serviceroute-00
Timothy SOETENS <timothy.soetens@alcatel.be> Thu, 13 September 2001 10:15 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id GAA00043 for <sip-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 06:15:07 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id FAA04115; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 05:53:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id FAA04087 for <sip@optimus.ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 05:53:03 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from relay1.alcatel.be (alc119.alcatel.be [195.207.101.119]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id FAA29872 for <sip@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 05:52:54 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from bemail01.net.alcatel.be (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay1.alcatel.be (8.10.1/8.10.1) with SMTP id f8D9prS24989; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 11:51:53 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from alcatel.be ([138.203.67.193]) by bemail01.net.alcatel.be (Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.7 (934.1 12-30-1999)) with SMTP id C1256AC6.00362C7B; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 11:51:43 +0200
Message-ID: <3BA081AE.5E87A59F@alcatel.be>
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 11:51:42 +0200
From: Timothy SOETENS <timothy.soetens@alcatel.be>
Organization: Alcatel
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Henrik Gustafsson <henrik.gustafsson@hotsip.com>
CC: sip mailing list <sip@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Sip] questions about drat-bjorkner-serviceroute-00
References: <3BA06D0B.E16E78D9@alcatel.be> <3BA07CED.5000401@hotsip.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: sip-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: sip-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: Session Initiation Protocol <sip.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: sip@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Henrik Gustafsson wrote: > > The service route is actually a loose route and the chain of service > routes could > be considered as a chain of outbound proxies. We didn't like initial > routing > and filtering services to be visited for a all following request, that > is the reason > we stated a service-route SHOULD only be inserted in a initial request. > If a > service needs to keep the call state, you should add a record-route, > like you do > today. > So the chain of service-route headers is actually a set of application servers in the originating domain, each responsible for a different server? > > Actually there is an error in the draft, the service route must also be > added to > the CANCEL. > > If a message contains both route-headers and service-route-headers, it is a > result of an error and the damage is minimized by just go for the route. > I think this should be repeated in section 4.2. As the text is stated now, section 4.2 says to go for the service-route header, at least that s how I interpreted it. > > /Henrik Gustafsson > > Timothy SOETENS wrote: > > >Hi All, > > > >I have some questions regarding the draft > >draft-bjorkner-serviceroute-00.txt. > > > >I think it is a good thing to route requests according to the service a > >user is subscribed for, but still I am confused in how the service-route > >header is used. > > > >1. "The service-route header should only be inserted in the first > >request in a call leg." (4.1, page 4) Is it not possible that you first > >contact the callee before deciding on which service to use? > > > >2. "If a request contians both route headers and service-route headers > >the route headers MUST be used for request routing." (4.1, page 5) > >Indeed, if the route headers are used for request routing, it is not > >useful to insert service-route headers in the subsequent requests. > >However, I have the feeling that service-route headers can be useful in > >subsequent requests. > > > >Comments? > > > >Thanks, > >Tim. > > -- Timothy Soetens _________________________________________ From the Network Strategy Group @ Alcatel Tel. +32-3-240.42.11 Fax +32-3-240.48.88 _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list http://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip Use sipping@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip
- [Sip] questions about drat-bjorkner-serviceroute-… Timothy SOETENS
- Re: [Sip] questions about drat-bjorkner-servicero… Henrik Gustafsson
- Re: [Sip] questions about drat-bjorkner-servicero… Timothy SOETENS
- Re: [Sip] questions about drat-bjorkner-servicero… Henrik Gustafsson