IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Sip] Comments on draft-kaplan-sip-info-events-00

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Mon, 03 December 2007 18:44 UTC

Return-path: <sip-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IzGH5-0000Jd-0f; Mon, 03 Dec 2007 13:44:11 -0500
Received: from sip by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1IzGH3-0000JC-4N for sip-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2007 13:44:09 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IzGH2-0000J1-QS for sip@ietf.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2007 13:44:08 -0500
Received: from nostrum-pt.tunnel.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net ([2001:470:1f03:267::2] helo=nostrum.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IzGH2-000177-CY for sip@ietf.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2007 13:44:08 -0500
Received: from dhcp-11b9.ietf70.org (dhcp-11b9.ietf70.org [130.129.17.185]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id lB3IhoUu084909 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 3 Dec 2007 12:43:51 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
Message-ID: <47544E62.2030808@nostrum.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2007 10:43:46 -0800
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Macintosh/20071031)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Dean Willis <dean.willis@softarmor.com>
Subject: Re: [Sip] Comments on draft-kaplan-sip-info-events-00
References: <5D1A7985295922448D5550C94DE29180019B7775@DEEXC1U01.de.lucent.com> <4751B684.7060603@cisco.com> <5D1A7985295922448D5550C94DE29180019B77BE@DEEXC1U01.de.lucent.com> <2B132E65-667C-4C0E-B21C-E3CEC3FBC748@softarmor.com>
In-Reply-To: <2B132E65-667C-4C0E-B21C-E3CEC3FBC748@softarmor.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received-SPF: pass (nostrum.com: 130.129.17.185 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism)
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.91.2/4984/Mon Dec 3 11:37:48 2007 on shaman.nostrum.com
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-)
X-Scan-Signature: 7a6398bf8aaeabc7a7bb696b6b0a2aad
Cc: sip@ietf.org, Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@cisco.com>, "DRAGE, Keith ((Keith))" <drage@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-BeenThere: sip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Session Initiation Protocol <sip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>, <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:sip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>, <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: sip-bounces@ietf.org

On 12/2/07 10:30 PM, Dean Willis wrote:
>
> But if the sender follows basic NIT rules and doesn't overlap 
> transactions within the dialog, then you'll never have out-of-order 
> delivery. If you're sending ordered delivery, don't send packet 2 
> until packet 1 gets ACKed.

I had it in my head many years ago that overlapping NITs were illegal 
also, but I couldn't ever find any supporting text in RFCs. I think it 
was in some pre-publication versions of 2543-bis, but got pulled out 
before finalization.

/a


_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email