RE: [Sip] Strict, Semi-Strict and Loose mode in RPH

At 09:13 AM 11/8/2004 -0500, Janet P Gunn wrote:
>James said,
>
> >[JG]I am not as concerned about this case (valid namespace.valid value -
> >just not authorized).
>
>I would think this is of concern - as anyone (literally) can be in this
>group.
>
>I was thinking that it was of less concern because it is someone who
>already knows the valid namespace and value.

the RPH document is in the public domain - and we are having a fairly 
public discussion about it (and its ramifications). Curious eyes are 
probably reading this too.

;-)

>But you are right, if it is someone who is randomly or systematically
>trying namespace/value combinations, we just told them "you got a hit".
>So I take it back about being less concerned.
>
>Janet

cheers,
James

                                *******************
                 Truth is not to be argued... it is to be presented

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip

RE: [Sip] Strict, Semi-Strict and Loose mode in RPH - not a good fit for ets and wps