RE: sipping-retarget (was RE: [Sip] RE: Question to Identity draf t)

I think we circled that one: in some cases it is appropriate, in 
other cases it is not.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peterson, Jon [mailto:jon.peterson@neustar.biz] 
> Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2005 16:51
> To: Paul Kyzivat
> Cc: Audet, Francois [SC100:9T51:EXCH]; Fries Steffen; 
> fluffy@cisco.com; IETF SIP List
> Subject: RE: sipping-retarget (was RE: [Sip] RE: Question to 
> Identity draft)
> 
> 
> 
> That is certainly one of the primary cases I had in mind when 
> I suggested that a "group cert" would sometimes work; a case 
> where there is in fact effectively a group user agent.
> 
> Jon Peterson
> NeuStar, Inc.
> 
> > I think this is largely a red herring. In many call center 
> > applications
> > it will be a requirement not to disclose the identity of the actual 
> > agent - probably not even a synonym. There is a high 
> likelihood that the 
> > call center will act as a B2BUA between the caller and the 
> agents, for 
> > that reason and others. ("Your call may be monitored for 
> quality.") So 
> > there will be no retargetting as far as the caller is 
> concerned, and no 
> > identity problem.
> > 
> > 	Paul
> > 
> 
> 