RE: [Sip] DTLS-SRTP - more work for the SIP group

["Francois Audet" <[e-mail]>]

Yes, I support the plan. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: DRAGE, Keith (Keith) [mailto:[e-mail]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2007 11:41
> To: [e-mail]
> Subject: [Sip] DTLS-SRTP - more work for the SIP group
> 
> (As WG co-chair)
> 
> You may remember that some time ago some work was identified 
> that crossed multiple working groups in the RAI area on the 
> above subject.
> Cullen took this ball away and played with it in a RAI BOF 
> and there came to some consensus on the way forward and what 
> documentation was required.
> 
> However we now need to put that work through real working 
> groups to get it to IESG so we are reallocating it to working groups.
> 
> I have requested milestones as follows:
> 
> Sep 2007	Requirements for media keying to WGLC (Informational)
> Nov 2007	Requirements for media keying to IESG (Informational)
> 
> This will be WG milestones in support of progressing 
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-wing-media-security-
> requiremen
> ts-04.txt
> And incorporating
> draft-wing-rtpsec-keying-eval
> 
> This charter item will essentially be a discussion of how we 
> got where we are now. It is therefore not the most 
> earthshattering document, but it has been considered valuable 
> to retain some permanent record and an informational RFC is 
> the way to do this.
> 
> Dec 2007	Establishment of secure media sessions using DTLS-SRTP
> to WGLC (PS)
> Feb 2008	Establishment of secure media sessions using DTLS-SRTP
> to IESG (PS)
> 
> This will be WG milestones in support of progressing 
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-fischl-sipping-media
> -dtls-03.t
> xt
> 
> This charter item goes to SIP because it is security related, 
> rather than to SIPPING. This is one deliverable out of a 
> package of 3, the other two being:
> 
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-avt-dtls-srtp-00.txt
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-fischl-mmusic-sdp-dt
> ls-03.txt
> 
> Which will be handled by AVT and MMUSIC respectively.
> 
> What do you need to do as SIP WG members
> ----------------------------------------
> 
> Provide consensus or not to move these drafts forward.
> 
> Do you agree with the identified author drafts above forming 
> the basis of these charter items listed above? If not please 
> express your objections to the list, with appropriate 
> technical considerations.
> Indications of support are appropriate as well, particularly 
> if you have a technical point you wish to make (alternatively 
> address the WG chairs with just "Yes I support").
> 
> Responses please within a calendar week, i.e. by Tuesday 25th 
> September 2007, unless there is a feeling that more time and 
> discussion are needed.
> 
> 
> Regards
> 
> Keith
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
> This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use 
> [e-mail] for questions on current sip 
> Use [e-mail] for new developments on the application of sip
> 


_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [e-mail] for questions on current sip
Use [e-mail] for new developments on the application of sip