[Sipbrandy] SIPBRANDY Meeting in Seoul?
"Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)" <gsalguei@cisco.com> Thu, 29 September 2016 17:20 UTC
Return-Path: <gsalguei@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: sipbrandy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipbrandy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AB8212B1D9; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 10:20:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -16.836
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.836 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.316, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YjvNdKFMzWwI; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 10:20:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2CD7612B1C6; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 10:20:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3850; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1475169603; x=1476379203; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=EmpzyqLQv7jXjugsDxsxZla9uWwkbsnLdqcBkE0Ur0I=; b=dMBPkyaKL/wu3Sh0Pn0wT3CYYdDFJWrfv5a/fZnTPg+rp1uEKRJnjqJc QKrMafsmz0s3wTOAuzkde+Nm2FqY/pwaSlmV45fXnbTTT6oNeuu96UFX/ d7ZTlCGabHIOKtZfw0Q9Mbta+kAkhrs4vlCUqm0LXQbAJ5koxAtuN6tOr M=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0D/AQAtTO1X/4gNJK1dGgEBAQECAQEBAQgBAQEBgz8BAQEBAR5XgQONK6YNgwOCD4IGJIV6HoFIOBQBAgEBAQEBAQFeHAuEaCNWEgEMPgIEMCcEDohSDq8JjGkBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEXBYY3gX2JaDgrgi8FmXcBhiZ0iFWBboRmiRqQaAEeNoUJhziBAAEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.31,268,1473120000"; d="scan'208,217";a="152298425"
Received: from alln-core-3.cisco.com ([173.36.13.136]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 29 Sep 2016 17:20:02 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-006.cisco.com (xch-aln-006.cisco.com [173.36.7.16]) by alln-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u8THK10u010480 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 29 Sep 2016 17:20:02 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-009.cisco.com (173.36.7.19) by XCH-ALN-006.cisco.com (173.36.7.16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 12:20:01 -0500
Received: from xch-aln-009.cisco.com ([173.36.7.19]) by XCH-ALN-009.cisco.com ([173.36.7.19]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 12:20:01 -0500
From: "Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)" <gsalguei@cisco.com>
To: "sipbrandy@ietf.org" <sipbrandy@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: SIPBRANDY Meeting in Seoul?
Thread-Index: AQHSGnW1kVf9YY0zYk6jHexjSnJL1Q==
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 17:20:01 +0000
Message-ID: <B2A985D6-06CB-4D15-A148-3C4441DB1760@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.82.169.55]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_B2A985D606CB4D15A1483C4441DB1760ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sipbrandy/Kp-Q92kZpRpQ5MvilkkwJh_Ldl4>
Cc: "sipbrandy-chairs@ietf.org" <sipbrandy-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: [Sipbrandy] SIPBRANDY Meeting in Seoul?
X-BeenThere: sipbrandy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIPBRANDY working group discussion list <sipbrandy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sipbrandy>, <mailto:sipbrandy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sipbrandy/>
List-Post: <mailto:sipbrandy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipbrandy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipbrandy>, <mailto:sipbrandy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 17:20:06 -0000
SIPBRANDY WG - The chairs are in the process of determining whether or not to schedule a SIPBRANDY meeting in Seoul. To this point all we have done is adopt WG versions of individual drafts to satisfy existing milestones. These are: Opportunistic SRTP draft - https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sipbrandy-osrtp-00 End-to-End SRTP draft - https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sipbrandy-rtpsec-00 Since then there has been no material discussion on either of these drafts. We have two requests of the WG: 1. Please inform the chairs immediately if there is a need for the WG to meet in Seoul 2. Let’s have some meaningful discussions on open issues so we can progress these drafts Thanks, Gonzalo Salgueiro Gonzalo Camarillo
- [Sipbrandy] SIPBRANDY Meeting in Seoul? Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)