Re: [sipcore] Call for adoption & WGLC: draft-barnes-sipcore-rfc4244bis-callflows
"DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com> Tue, 26 June 2012 16:41 UTC
Return-Path: <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 805D221F8549 for <sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 09:41:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -109.859
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-109.859 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.390, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cvou3SjqlaAZ for <sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 09:41:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smail3.alcatel.fr (smail3.alcatel.fr [64.208.49.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B119821F8548 for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 09:41:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from FRMRSSXCHHUB04.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com (FRMRSSXCHHUB04.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com [135.120.45.64]) by smail3.alcatel.fr (8.14.3/8.14.3/ICT) with ESMTP id q5QGff7T017172 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT) for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 18:41:42 +0200
Received: from FRMRSSXCHMBSC3.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.120.45.44]) by FRMRSSXCHHUB04.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.120.45.64]) with mapi; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 18:41:41 +0200
From: "DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com>
To: "SIPCORE (Session Initiation Protocol Core) WG" <sipcore@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 18:41:39 +0200
Thread-Topic: [sipcore] Call for adoption & WGLC: draft-barnes-sipcore-rfc4244bis-callflows
Thread-Index: Ac1P30hSyse6Ez9GST+k1yNzsQ1vewD2x69g
Message-ID: <EDC0A1AE77C57744B664A310A0B23AE240952B6B@FRMRSSXCHMBSC3.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com>
References: <4FE36DDA.3080103@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <4FE36DDA.3080103@nostrum.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.69 on 155.132.188.83
Subject: Re: [sipcore] Call for adoption & WGLC: draft-barnes-sipcore-rfc4244bis-callflows
X-BeenThere: sipcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Core Working Group <sipcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sipcore>
List-Post: <mailto:sipcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 16:41:45 -0000
Out of interest, why wasn't this adopted following the call for adoption on the 7th May on the sipcore list? Keith -----Original Message----- From: sipcore-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:sipcore-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Adam Roach - SIPCORE Chair Sent: 21 June 2012 19:54 To: SIPCORE (Session Initiation Protocol Core) WG Subject: [sipcore] Call for adoption & WGLC: draft-barnes-sipcore-rfc4244bis-callflows [as chair] SIPCORE Working Group: As you are probably aware, back in June of 2010, we decided to split the History-Info callflows out of the (already adopted) document draft-ietf-sipcore-rfc4244bis. The callflows document was not formally adopted by the working group, but remains an important informational companion to the base specification. As part of the publication process, then, we would like to see draft-barnes-sipcore-rfc4244bis-callflows sent to the RFC editor at the same time as draft-ietf-sipcore-rfc4244bis. To that end, we are announcing a two-week call for working group adoption at the same time as a two-week working group last call. We feel this timing overlap is appropriate due to the maturity of the document combined with the fact that its text was, at a point in the past, part of an adopted working group document. Interested parties should respond to this message with a clear indication of whether they support the adoption of draft-barnes-sipcore-rfc4244bis-callflows as a working group document under the existing milestone that includes draft-ietf-sipcore-rfc4244bis. Additionally, any final comments on the contents of the document should be provided during this two-week last call period. This call for adoption and WGLC ends on Friday, July 6th. The document is available here: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-barnes-sipcore-rfc4244bis-callflows-03 /a _______________________________________________ sipcore mailing list sipcore@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore
- [sipcore] Call for adoption & WGLC: draft-barnes-… Adam Roach - SIPCORE Chair
- Re: [sipcore] Call for adoption & WGLC: draft-bar… DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [sipcore] Call for adoption & WGLC: draft-bar… Adam Roach
- [sipcore] PLEASE RESPOND -- Re: Call for adoption… Adam Roach
- Re: [sipcore] PLEASE RESPOND -- Re: Call for adop… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [sipcore] PLEASE RESPOND -- Re: Call for adop… Olle E. Johansson
- Re: [sipcore] PLEASE RESPOND -- Re: Call for adop… Worley, Dale R (Dale)
- Re: [sipcore] PLEASE RESPOND -- Re: Call for adop… Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [sipcore] PLEASE RESPOND -- Re: Call for adop… Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: [sipcore] PLEASE RESPOND -- Re: Call for adop… Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [sipcore] PLEASE RESPOND -- Re: Call for adop… Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: [sipcore] PLEASE RESPOND -- Re: Call for adop… R.Jesske
- Re: [sipcore] PLEASE RESPOND -- Re: Call for adop… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [sipcore] PLEASE RESPOND -- Re: Call for adop… Mary Barnes
- Re: [sipcore] PLEASE RESPOND -- Re: Call for adop… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [sipcore] PLEASE RESPOND -- Re: Call for adop… Worley, Dale R (Dale)