Re: [sipcore] PLEASE RESPOND -- Re: Call for adoption & WGLC: draft-barnes-sipcore-rfc4244bis-callflows

Yes, many do tend to follow the call flows and not so carefully read the
spec, but there's not a thing we can do about stupidity.  However, the
majority of people are visual learners and thus having a call flow document
is an extremely useful aid to understanding the spec.

I'm also hoping your comment is made as an individual and not as a chair ;)

Mary.

On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 10:51 AM, Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu> wrote:

> On 7/5/12 4:40 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
>
>  Hi, I have not too much interest in how History-Info works, but a
>> standard document with call-flows will always help and make easier the
>> spec adoption. So IMHO it's a useful draft and therefore I support it.
>> If someday I have to implement History-Info I will be happy if this
>> draft has become a standard :)
>>
>
> And like many, you will implement to the examples, without bothering to
> look at the spec, right? :-)
>
>         Thanks,
>         Paul
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> sipcore mailing list
> sipcore@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/**listinfo/sipcore<https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>
>