Re: [sipcore] I-D Action: draft-ietf-sipcore-sip-token-authnz-02.txt

Rifaat Shekh-Yusef <rifaat.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 10 July 2019 01:29 UTC

Return-Path: <rifaat.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 670D412013B for <sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 18:29:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.702
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.702 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, PDS_NO_HELO_DNS=1.295, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m9g_mVf8yNUJ for <sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 18:29:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd2a.google.com (mail-io1-xd2a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37F88120077 for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 18:29:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd2a.google.com with SMTP id j5so1124666ioj.8 for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 18:29:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=3Ji09Hkw2Wpjv9nYdB03KuK0SLYRJCI9CASPUcEnskw=; b=q+beUgqR2K00pwUjwzT8FtiE/GpSUwYN7gNLy6r2dlUM6ptxomUHDcZJQZcKZGJW1x sWpwA6twxwFl6Zc+p7OK2b7Miks0Zv9MHeEXBcvOXavBcD2wCIlbCadJ/aw4xQRIFKHJ i8hosFPkkfcvGSLvAbccv5Y0PYsekYiLr+i9Wrt3FQJ44F2VRCI8yqFGHjUiCS+6NvaI TdoxR88zLNU8phjCS0hgVowhpDQRK9JkImtgXF+Wd6UIjB52U1FMrSVmP7ZfAWdiFmFj ijPlgI/R2U2uCilRBGA1urYC78UKIXBQFrAxLgLpjJbsro85l4ltX//vzieKpRoGbM8u S/QA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=3Ji09Hkw2Wpjv9nYdB03KuK0SLYRJCI9CASPUcEnskw=; b=qJk+CDbYiVnxFUCuoMsxm4fLzU6t5vLE1sq4Ca1KRxmBNT8+GhQ6w/euZFq14IGNuC NxsQ633GwzSxLYHu1ZkbhJ1szroicWK3QSPSwJ2aXftS4e/3I9DVCH+bFPBi9sN10bzz xioMKaJEFbFeG5NDYhhoEuLPt824uxSuM9J93pUfGQ4/sufTOpuJdPzQyYJfTB0RprxY ArMP6ecHZsjRqUmvey2Cvip6jj7JN1wBhImor7AaljxBD/wzuLTJzCKl5lGYXxtMG4rP W8kCaEF+z95agTKE5mm/isvDYsY0lDR8DYN7s08b03Q5nC3G3PPacfzUgLdnuPbFkuoJ 2Ojw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWF3SfyJao/Ud9Y59k8/RP2tygm5Cr27qVhAJSH3TgyDyWFhdU3 ubXmP38o0xbYq6ex6hckaw8M4VAQAzZzfd6RxPM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw5iH2sNauHgwhx35d2r/CLZyedns/XLrVGYHRLqOYhAmDCQSx2p71sHRYacOgevqQucvtw9op8OSl5jCei4tM=
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:9282:: with SMTP id s2mr2746669iom.36.1562722148559; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 18:29:08 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <156249821133.14592.1211919336596009446@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAGL6epLsP_UfZMAcFLsORrR05Enu-vp=jnkgUFuKSttQm8swAw@mail.gmail.com> <c8d5c42e-ab21-80e8-3189-c8592dd02d3a@alum.mit.edu> <HE1PR07MB3161C55955B2FCED2C0F6A9993F60@HE1PR07MB3161.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <68ed93ae-57df-6bc7-774b-47959417abda@alum.mit.edu> <HE1PR07MB3161D46B4A44FC7E789ADDB893F10@HE1PR07MB3161.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <4a9787e5-b5e2-bc08-0fa0-fae6bd44148d@alum.mit.edu> <527F4C39-F065-4335-A939-6D443F1801E7@ericsson.com> <CAD5OKxuK_2+JcbGvo6LNeRbCYXWXQmhKQPNUzoZvZEOupPWyjw@mail.gmail.com> <HE1PR07MB3161612130F07C8F727A2BB693F10@HE1PR07MB3161.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <CAD5OKxtR-WBhfa4msbAfXoK7JowYaKK3fSCbw0cXm6SRGwkLxg@mail.gmail.com> <CAGL6epK8Z938pnMKVyWGBK=6fMzNq6+gmxro-AAO2nzvGT4jeg@mail.gmail.com> <CAD5OKxs6g+6mLbMRc9C0q5BSSn=+7HHzKf5Ya5uL-+RbhVfEaA@mail.gmail.com> <CAGL6epKfLWA=RW3T84feSud9sZ+TcpB=XRA6fvTzP-jL3h4+4A@mail.gmail.com> <CAD5OKxs3=XdOFYThY1gCu23M4nqJV-bJOSCU7-Ogn0J=xy+E3A@mail.gmail.com> <CAGL6epJWXBTcnNk3nMN3Yfsh5y6+pddQSW_MbkAdNZbmWf6_Gg@mail.gmail.com> <CAD5OKxt=sJhKGRRFPUon=JokbJ2Vb=P7GcfJ8LpXt_Yp-eOg3Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAD5OKxt=sJhKGRRFPUon=JokbJ2Vb=P7GcfJ8LpXt_Yp-eOg3Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Rifaat Shekh-Yusef <rifaat.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 21:28:58 -0400
Message-ID: <CAGL6ep+CGEs8OW4vO2vNuGg8co9rXiUiD1JWaR9W7BBm8+SpQw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>
Cc: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>, "sipcore@ietf.org" <sipcore@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000008c3717058d499ab9"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sipcore/7vkFjSitJOwT5MvBaIC1am_m_pM>
Subject: Re: [sipcore] I-D Action: draft-ietf-sipcore-sip-token-authnz-02.txt
X-BeenThere: sipcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Core Working Group <sipcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sipcore/>
List-Post: <mailto:sipcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 01:29:10 -0000

For me, the main motivation is SSO.
The user would use one set of corporate credentials to authenticate, login
to a deskphone, and get access to SIP and non-SIP services.

I am not sure I am following your use case.
How would the user authenticate and obtain a an access token in this case?

Regards,
 Rifaat




On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 8:53 PM Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 8:30 PM Rifaat Shekh-Yusef <rifaat.ietf@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> The document clearly allows the use of access token to authenticate
>> non-REGISTER requests when challenged in the context of the same realm.
>>
>> Whether that is needed or not is a different discussion.
>> Assuming the UA was able to authenticate the user and obtain an access
>> token, then establish an authenticated TLS channel with the server, and
>> register the user; is there a need for further challenges from server?
>>
>>
> Typically, for SIP, user authentication is not tied to the TLS connection.
> One of the reasons for this is that multiple users can use the same TLS
> connection in federated systems. This is especially true for Confidential
> UA, which have trust relationship with a proxy and can maintain a secure
> connection to the registrar/proxy on behalf of multiple clients.
>
> Once again, it would be much easier to discuss if you can provide a use
> specific case for OAuth with confidential UA. I can easily think of a OAuth
> use case for Public User Agent, but only have a vague idea what OAuth with
> Confidential UA would be.
>
> The example I can think of, would be some sort of hot desk application,
> where user allows a Local PBX to register with User Home PBX to accept
> calls on behalf of user in a remote location. In this case, Local PBX and
> User Home PBX will be federated systems which will use a single TLS
> connection for multiple calls or end user devices. Local PBX and User Home
> PBX will have a trust relationship, possibly with mutual TLS certificate
> authentications. A company wide directory server will be used to store
> actual user credentials and will be used to authenticate the user and
> generate the token.
>
> Best Regards,
> _____________
> Roman Shpount
>
>