[sipcore] Spencer Dawkins' Yes on draft-ietf-sipcore-dns-dual-stack-07: (with COMMENT)

"Spencer Dawkins" <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 17 August 2016 03:31 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Spencer Dawkins <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <147140468741.19939.3811368106001545602.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 20:31:27 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sipcore/BggZHgcsWoG4zRhR_XsagWxlV4E>
Cc: sipcore@ietf.org, draft-ietf-sipcore-dns-dual-stack@ietf.org, sipcore-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: [sipcore] Spencer Dawkins' Yes on draft-ietf-sipcore-dns-dual-stack-07: (with COMMENT)

Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-sipcore-dns-dual-stack-07: Yes

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sipcore-dns-dual-stack/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I appreciate this work. I do have one comment.

Could you provide some explanation for the reader as to why SIP is
"different", following this statement? Even an example would be useful.

   Unfortunately, in common SIP situations, it is not possible to "race"
   simultaneous request attempts using two address families.

Re: [sipcore] Spencer Dawkins' Yes on draft-ietf-… Spencer Dawkins at IETF
Re: [sipcore] Spencer Dawkins' Yes on draft-ietf-… Dale R. Worley
[sipcore] Spencer Dawkins' Yes on draft-ietf-sipc… Spencer Dawkins