Re: [sipcore] draft-ietf-sipcore-keep - Peter's comments

[Christer Holmberg <[e-mail]>]

Hi Peter,

>I have read draft-ietf-sipcore-keep in detail for the first time.
>
>I have one questions and some Nits.
>
>Question: 7.3 Should the TRYING (not shown) from P1 to Alice have
>keep=30 in it? What if the 200 OK takes e.g. longer than 30sec and the
>NAT pinhole closes?

It is true that the flow only shows the 200 OK, but the text in section 4.4 responses in general.

I guess we could add some text that points out that the keep value should be sent as soon as possible, as it may take a while before the final response is sent.

--------------

>Nits
>1. s/Eventhough/Even though/
>
>1.3 "As specified in [RFC5626], usage keep-alives is not implicitly
>negotiated for such flows, why usage needs to be explicitly
>negotiated." Re-phrase?
>
>4.2.1 s/The section/This section/
>
>4.4 para 2. This paragraph is one sentence. I read it many times - I gave up.

Thanks for your comments!

Regards,

Christer