Re: [sipcore] draft-ietf-sipcore-keep
Peter Musgrave <peter.musgrave@magorcorp.com> Sun, 25 July 2010 11:31 UTC
Return-Path: <peter.musgrave@magorcorp.com>
X-Original-To: sipcore@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipcore@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A8FE3A6880 for <sipcore@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 25 Jul 2010 04:31:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.224
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.224 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.247, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8IC0C987WhaM for <sipcore@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 25 Jul 2010 04:31:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qy0-f172.google.com (mail-qy0-f172.google.com [209.85.216.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CBC73A682E for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Sun, 25 Jul 2010 04:31:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qyk1 with SMTP id 1so1285552qyk.10 for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Sun, 25 Jul 2010 04:31:52 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.224.19.144 with SMTP id a16mr4923771qab.346.1280057511870; Sun, 25 Jul 2010 04:31:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.20.198 with HTTP; Sun, 25 Jul 2010 04:31:51 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2010 13:31:51 +0200
Message-ID: <AANLkTin1E2Y11obMsv6V99PCEvdS_vJhH8-gcix41DYe@mail.gmail.com>
From: Peter Musgrave <peter.musgrave@magorcorp.com>
To: SIPCORE <sipcore@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Subject: Re: [sipcore] draft-ietf-sipcore-keep
X-BeenThere: sipcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Core Working Group <sipcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sipcore>
List-Post: <mailto:sipcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2010 11:31:33 -0000
Hi, I have read draft-ietf-sipcore-keep in detail for the first time. I have one questions and some Nits. Question: 7.3 Should the TRYING (not shown) from P1 to Alice have keep=30 in it? What if the 200 OK takes e.g. longer than 30sec and the NAT pinhole closes? I think the draft is in very good shape. Peter Musgrave Nits 1. s/Eventhough/Even though/ 1.3 "As specified in [RFC5626], usage keep-alives is not implicitly negotiated for such flows, why usage needs to be explicitly negotiated." Re-phrase? 4.2.1 s/The section/This section/ 4.4 para 2. This paragraph is one sentence. I read it many times - I gave up.
- Re: [sipcore] draft-ietf-sipcore-keep Peter Musgrave