Re: [sipcore] 4244bis-05: the infamous "rc" param

Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com> Tue, 21 June 2011 23:07 UTC

Return-Path: <fluffy@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88C3421F851C for <sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 16:07:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.591
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.591 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.008, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lCBgdkZh4VF9 for <sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 16:07:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ams-iport-1.cisco.com (ams-iport-1.cisco.com [144.254.224.140]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CA2321F8515 for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 16:07:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=fluffy@cisco.com; l=291; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1308697641; x=1309907241; h=subject:mime-version:from:in-reply-to:date:cc: content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=C9GBOBcy/OHJilYbBEV04xChLJ4mn7w1AybKprSrGpo=; b=NU9Yim7OIlbKshpaEXeH9qddqtwScMNmUL/+IjB9Sdwa+vpPTxitij1y Im1T+Sw/spWik12PVSLXeb/JHWFXAwmP+PZ7rd3F8vA5BiaEqkyOgk09m GKYGczrGZFWOMl3JrqCPzw4ZUaYZwiG2XhN2bxOgk/Spod5zsIuUR06U1 o=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAIMjAU5Io8UT/2dsb2JhbABHDacGd4hzoVaeIIMegwwEhyKKRJAm
Received: from bgl-core-4.cisco.com ([72.163.197.19]) by ams-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 21 Jun 2011 23:07:19 +0000
Received: from dhcp-171-68-21-143.cisco.com (dhcp-171-68-21-143.cisco.com [171.68.21.143]) by bgl-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p5LN7G2f014374; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 23:07:18 GMT
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <88801004-2367-4BE3-8564-3228A279B9E1@acmepacket.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 16:07:18 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <EC6E8740-83D9-48BA-9A75-8A93E9F38A78@cisco.com>
References: <7A463F33-4115-4E9D-8D1C-C8F49BA9CFDD@acmepacket.com> <7E5B50A1-81D0-433A-BAEF-F7B9037F4691@ntt-at.com> <88801004-2367-4BE3-8564-3228A279B9E1@acmepacket.com>
To: Hadriel Kaplan <hkaplan@acmepacket.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: "sipcore@ietf.org WG" <sipcore@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sipcore] 4244bis-05: the infamous "rc" param
X-BeenThere: sipcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Core Working Group <sipcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sipcore>
List-Post: <mailto:sipcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 23:07:30 -0000

On Jun 17, 2011, at 9:07 , Hadriel Kaplan wrote:

> What "rc" should actually stand for is "Request-uri Changed".  It should be populated in ALL cases where the request-URI is changed, but where the new target is still the same identity (ie, it's not an "mp" tag instead),
+1