[sipcore] Open isues in draft-ietf-sipcore-sip-websocket-09

[Iñaki Baz Castillo <[e-mail]>]

Hi all,

Once  draft-ietf-sipcore-sip-websocket-09 has been submitted, and
after some comments in the WG, I consider that there are still the
following open issues (to be addressed in a new revision):



1) Remove "_This section is non-normative_" text at the top of
non-normative sections.

Those sections don't contain normative keywords (MUST, SHOULD) so they
are indeed non-normative. No need for such an statement.




2 Decide whether the draft updates 3261 or not.

After recent discussion in the WG my opinion is that if somebody wants
to build a SIP UDP and/or TCP device during 2013 year, he does not
need to read draft-ietf-sipcore-sip-websocket, and thus the draft does
not update RFC 3261.

The other point of view is that the draft makes implementation of both
UDP and TCP transports non mandatory if WS is implemented. This opens
the door to two solutions:

a) Stating that in the draft (as currently it does).

b) A new WG item for allowing other transports without requiring UDP/TCP.





In draft-ietf-sipcore-sip-websocket-09 we have tryed to address all
the other open issues reported by members of the WG after 08 was
published. I hope changes and additions in 09 satisfy their concerns.
Otherwise please let us know and we will address them in rev 10.



Thanks a lot to all.



--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<[e-mail]>