IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sipcore] RFC4028 : Very basic question in 8.1

Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu> Thu, 09 July 2020 15:48 UTC

Return-Path: <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE8203A0C93 for <sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Jul 2020 08:48:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.002
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.002 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alum.mit.edu
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D7EhJ7SvRQ5d for <sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Jul 2020 08:48:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from NAM11-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-co1nam11on2080.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.220.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A5E03A0C88 for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Jul 2020 08:48:21 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=CYh/rfYQkJRNd+iZpWmH31jCYPFRHHrTFhwNDXRyYt7Z3K3FSsLkx1743J411YRm+qggnJPedJINOixGodo46ikqJXZduoAKVoSHzkrYNutmObNPrSV6P8+SIqOJXV1wSSULf7aQUC41OIaww6kntbqOKCjBGn5P2CsWh8Ob/XXC5V47TyNhM63TQXaCAvmLDP7Dro0M/di38ZoRXN+OO63l8TPwVZX7XHcrK8eLjUm201cotF7t0L4+7lD3pRT/b3WnkiGi+lbEe3+HGPcQVE9kgYLzOZVcnfaN50fW+LIZUMjjPCYozXXRvfK/8NvqXoGxk4N6Q+2NOnHfBr1Oeg==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=oAlTr8HUHE4B9vc8OtgWhWoyRLQPjN6pFDzgJgg8Y2I=; b=W5KiruqtnXT2G+Skd6h8q7Mi9JgCZ26d3AUHWFHoWRzNGP0pEVqJ8T5etZMb3fgvEuZDrrWAeKWTpHicDXy7jT0ajK1pngb9oZGZnzk24xG2xi0aRcSAv+xoWex6C2QFTBSZSWu6IgJoP1/ZhZXprywsKvLmW9VjsD3kM99YO/ggCFxrexJf0/w9YiwfxgxmZ7byVvXDtN9yj/zA4t1qjwp2mDkcN/TsN2KaGC1aWiyWzpMVDnvU0MHS1um6A82L6hsildB62iusCWNaCSy9CffXXNri4RfO2cRJGXmrqQULgXnBvS2kER7ztZt8UHJHa3ZHF9lPJtXJyGUasxpm3g==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass (sender ip is 18.7.68.33) smtp.rcpttodomain=ietf.org smtp.mailfrom=alum.mit.edu; dmarc=bestguesspass action=none header.from=alum.mit.edu; dkim=none (message not signed); arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alum.mit.edu; s=selector2; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=oAlTr8HUHE4B9vc8OtgWhWoyRLQPjN6pFDzgJgg8Y2I=; b=FbiUbkH0xfCcjapr2CuJy0DSL1WFjrt4n4fbm8nrNqV2trxkQgt8CF4KOcf+wTdE9UkH238yDETDAmS9R11kg8zwJkDdEgPbejvUaVU3pWqoXe/odB3H2fJ6T3K1X4P3Az27sHv3LopsKuvzDnHOFI8kI3kkL9avscdUnOjA0wY=
Received: from CY4PR20CA0009.namprd20.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:903:98::19) by MW2PR12MB2492.namprd12.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:907:8::19) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3153.23; Thu, 9 Jul 2020 15:48:19 +0000
Received: from CY1NAM02FT021.eop-nam02.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:903:98:cafe::8e) by CY4PR20CA0009.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:903:98::19) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3174.22 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 9 Jul 2020 15:48:19 +0000
X-MS-Exchange-Authentication-Results: spf=pass (sender IP is 18.7.68.33) smtp.mailfrom=alum.mit.edu; ietf.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;ietf.org; dmarc=bestguesspass action=none header.from=alum.mit.edu;
Received-SPF: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of alum.mit.edu designates 18.7.68.33 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=18.7.68.33; helo=outgoing-alum.mit.edu;
Received: from outgoing-alum.mit.edu (18.7.68.33) by CY1NAM02FT021.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.75.187) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3174.21 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 9 Jul 2020 15:48:18 +0000
Received: from Kokiri.localdomain (c-24-62-227-142.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [24.62.227.142]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as pkyzivat@ALUM.MIT.EDU) by outgoing-alum.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 069FmGJe003744 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Jul 2020 11:48:17 -0400
To: sipcore@ietf.org
References: <24d093f2-284f-a068-1cf1-8fb1b9310ff0@gmail.com> <CAD5OKxu1Ua79rEg-udgD-RxZjrfTmmyZMmDGvPQXp5xc1kzn1Q@mail.gmail.com> <8ab9ef7d-1df0-2adc-70fa-0473526442cb@gmail.com> <CAD5OKxuNsf1YDMZw6_KvONMafCE+vaHeNLEQoqCscp5wqHFHrA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
Message-ID: <7c1e3969-af88-80ca-96c4-7e6bb1d2a172@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2020 11:48:16 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAD5OKxuNsf1YDMZw6_KvONMafCE+vaHeNLEQoqCscp5wqHFHrA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:18.7.68.33; CTRY:US; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:CAL; SFV:NSPM; H:outgoing-alum.mit.edu; PTR:outgoing-alum.mit.edu; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(376002)(39860400002)(136003)(396003)(346002)(46966005)(75432002)(36906005)(47076004)(786003)(82740400003)(316002)(53546011)(5660300002)(8676002)(186003)(478600001)(26005)(70206006)(31686004)(70586007)(7596003)(8936002)(6916009)(82310400002)(356005)(2906002)(86362001)(4744005)(956004)(2616005)(31696002)(336012)(43740500002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email
X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 363fd7a2-651e-46ca-2795-08d8241f8066
X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: MW2PR12MB2492:
X-Microsoft-Antispam-PRVS: <MW2PR12MB24921866EE9F263097916E01F9640@MW2PR12MB2492.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
X-MS-Oob-TLC-OOBClassifiers: OLM:8882;
X-Forefront-PRVS: 04599F3534
X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck: 1
X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;
X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: LfdfySSvsptPAbmkIGg9eSB6Ql2smJ9BCXDFF8wWgSZbQwA4UQ1S8ZWwQ7YMfzxLsTtKQ1syyysQHz7tq2fLcNBKsEQakx7s6W3YB9asj8zSuYsVY7yC0frpOe/XcI5NqMaDKqY8Gni+/KbKcMlzcloZlGFroZaWigCshkRfuDAp8ymvIKKf7Vx5270THEdv6EXDfpymHRQuTlrZVAwmYnuf53p9QtipnCKc/ftySrdEUmSQHDBfoYHVc7g8UnWKBVxnUe9ibLF2PxMYc0eD/3WCD9MvZOx36evlXT/7rpW0UUq4zvbjG77IVnPJsTHxxoNsQ1cVwUZich2qqq6qgPUhpKNrNxpon9jDju6oNhvhtuJSm4IeLp2+mwhHAXKzY/ixozzvz+sgvUM40ZRvotRRDA2F6Paw+fQKu0g7AYY=
X-OriginatorOrg: alum.mit.edu
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Jul 2020 15:48:18.6541 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 363fd7a2-651e-46ca-2795-08d8241f8066
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 3326b102-c043-408b-a990-b89e477d582f
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalAttributedTenantConnectingIp: TenantId=3326b102-c043-408b-a990-b89e477d582f; Ip=[18.7.68.33]; Helo=[outgoing-alum.mit.edu]
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: CY1NAM02FT021.eop-nam02.prod.protection.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: HybridOnPrem
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MW2PR12MB2492
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sipcore/W93vRUFu_3nC8il1DfU9v2g2FOQ>
Subject: Re: [sipcore] RFC4028 : Very basic question in 8.1
X-BeenThere: sipcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Core Working Group <sipcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sipcore/>
List-Post: <mailto:sipcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2020 15:48:24 -0000

On 7/9/20 11:15 AM, Roman Shpount wrote:

>     No, You seem to attach great importance to that point, but I don't
>     understand the importance of that.
>     Do you argue that it is enough for each developer to address any
>     issues on their own?
> 
> I am arguing that this is an old and widely deployed specification.  It 
> might not be clearly written but it is widely implemented which resulted 
> in some general consensus on how it is supposed to work. Making changes 
> to it is dangerous unless they are targeting specific issues.

I have been fielding questions about this rfc for almost two decades. 
Based on that there is widespread misunderstanding of it.

I think it would be very helpful to at least add some overview 
discussion of what this mechanism is good for and what it is not good 
for. Something along the lines of what I put in my prior reply.

	Thanks,
	Paul

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email