Re: [sipcore] draft-barnes-sipcore-rfc4244bis - privacy syntax

"Dale Worley" <dworley@nortel.com> Thu, 30 July 2009 20:52 UTC

Return-Path: <dworley@nortel.com>
X-Original-To: sipcore@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipcore@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD0FB3A71C2 for <sipcore@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 13:52:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Kvcq8q8ygV9I for <sipcore@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 13:52:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zrtps0kp.nortel.com (zrtps0kp.nortel.com [47.140.192.56]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FCDA3A6A02 for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 13:52:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zrtphxs1.corp.nortel.com (zrtphxs1.corp.nortel.com [47.140.202.46]) by zrtps0kp.nortel.com (Switch-2.2.6/Switch-2.2.0) with ESMTP id n6UKqPh12939 for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 20:52:25 GMT
Received: from [47.16.90.165] ([47.16.90.165]) by zrtphxs1.corp.nortel.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 30 Jul 2009 16:52:20 -0400
From: Dale Worley <dworley@nortel.com>
To: Francois Audet <audet@nortel.com>
In-Reply-To: <1ECE0EB50388174790F9694F77522CCF1EEDEAB8@zrc2hxm0.corp.nortel.com>
References: <1246996560.5962.37.camel@victoria-pingtel-com.us.nortel.com> <1ECE0EB50388174790F9694F77522CCF1EDE5C07@zrc2hxm0.corp.nortel.com> <1247077928.3712.26.camel@victoria-pingtel-com.us.nortel.com> <1ECE0EB50388174790F9694F77522CCF1EE8A67C@zrc2hxm0.corp.nortel.com> <1247257464.3757.67.camel@victoria-pingtel-com.us.nortel.com> <1ECE0EB50388174790F9694F77522CCF1EEDE853@zrc2hxm0.corp.nortel.com> <1ECE0EB50388174790F9694F77522CCF1EEDEAB8@zrc2hxm0.corp.nortel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Organization: Nortel Networks
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 16:52:20 -0400
Message-Id: <1248987140.3740.43.camel@victoria-pingtel-com.us.nortel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.3 (2.12.3-5.fc8)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Jul 2009 20:52:20.0758 (UTC) FILETIME=[A1C88360:01CA1157]
Cc: SIPCORE <sipcore@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sipcore] draft-barnes-sipcore-rfc4244bis - privacy syntax
X-BeenThere: sipcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Core Working Group <sipcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sipcore>
List-Post: <mailto:sipcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 20:52:34 -0000

On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 20:36 -0400, Audet, Francois (SC100:3055) wrote:
> While it's debatable if it was the right choice back in 2002, it
> seems a bit late to change it now. Especially since it will not
> be backwards compatible.

I think I've already mentioned that I don't see us changing that
feature.  But I wanted to review it to understand why it was done that
way.

Dale