IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sipcore] Review of draft-ietf-sipcore-status-unwanted-04

Henning Schulzrinne <Henning.Schulzrinne@fcc.gov> Thu, 20 April 2017 23:35 UTC

Return-Path: <Henning.Schulzrinne@fcc.gov>
X-Original-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DFEB129BBD; Thu, 20 Apr 2017 16:35:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=fccoffice.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u4kH07lFe4tQ; Thu, 20 Apr 2017 16:35:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-0024ed01.pphosted.com (mx0b-0024ed01.pphosted.com [148.163.153.198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85B11129B75; Thu, 20 Apr 2017 16:35:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0102174.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-0024ed01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.20/8.16.0.20) with SMTP id v3KNZHRt005226; Thu, 20 Apr 2017 23:35:17 GMT
Received: from gcc01-dm2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-dm2gcc01lp0056.outbound.protection.outlook.com [23.103.198.56]) by mx0b-0024ed01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 29wqpe9qhg-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 20 Apr 2017 23:35:17 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fccoffice.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-fcc-gov; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=cT/p4kNmjuakHzCvMpKfn/S5Lqj9tsgvVNVbESH5/Ks=; b=sXC/HsxJGuFps6k6lA3l3X0uATNMTAhJ925uNrRBtwWJN34Ted/4nCiZDn/N9Xk4xDfhgbPct4jLhNSM03iEaO/kSJJJw36jFBuDOpmUACH9hBiMI3BGPQzFmar8ubJ8uEwfRj78Km9wxOGG+DVdv1356sDXyaeXPZVi0ZEfbZo=
Received: from CY1PR09MB0634.namprd09.prod.outlook.com (10.160.151.21) by CY1PR09MB0636.namprd09.prod.outlook.com (10.160.151.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1034.10; Thu, 20 Apr 2017 23:35:16 +0000
Received: from CY1PR09MB0634.namprd09.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.151.21]) by CY1PR09MB0634.namprd09.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.151.21]) with mapi id 15.01.1034.018; Thu, 20 Apr 2017 23:35:16 +0000
From: Henning Schulzrinne <Henning.Schulzrinne@fcc.gov>
To: Peter Yee <peter@akayla.com>, "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>
CC: "sipcore@ietf.org" <sipcore@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-sipcore-status-unwanted.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-sipcore-status-unwanted.all@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Review of draft-ietf-sipcore-status-unwanted-04
Thread-Index: AQHSor6bOa15gxoBWk6pbW5i+wNrkKHPEZ67
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 23:35:15 +0000
Message-ID: <CY1PR09MB0634018DB677B3D60B82AF84EA1B0@CY1PR09MB0634.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
References: <149015426220.3518.3546300688917567228@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <149015426220.3518.3546300688917567228@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: ietf.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;ietf.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=fcc.gov;
x-originating-ip: [172.56.3.117]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; CY1PR09MB0636; 7:vg5JZ6KS8IOaAiVnZl1tsL4kesizWSXmF9+zHmRq8YY0JLMgZ4VWq5OLO0v8HvQydbobclJT3/Lxlz8v/i88EqyQiByD6yuve4QbTHYYWdgEnNH+LHtYG8/0hCto2A68Qy+YN7lxokMmQwS5tnFCK3piT0ccgtXrsv71Q3rtutWGA4nwHVrl7Qgmt97pI7BCs0TKTlGOWLTfi3N2qTuAOu2tNEU46Ok75bolM47k3fv83bvr95wxAtbB3shB+D8pcBQr2yP/yZ2I2aU3jVkYGmaJUa2v6jpo3/Ye372aUh7yfXfhcaMlueBtMITLgkV2Ihic6iWeMCZcnFj3CymHrQ==
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: ada04fe3-f616-488d-207a-08d48845e616
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(22001)(2017030254075)(201703131423075)(201703031133081); SRVR:CY1PR09MB0636;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <CY1PR09MB0636474D7E439CE503745243EA1B0@CY1PR09MB0636.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(10436049006162);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040450)(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(93006095)(93001095)(3002001)(10201501046)(6041248)(20161123564025)(20161123560025)(20161123562025)(201703131423075)(201702281528075)(201703061421075)(20161123555025)(6072148); SRVR:CY1PR09MB0636; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:CY1PR09MB0636;
x-forefront-prvs: 02830F0362
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(39410400002)(39840400002)(39400400002)(39450400003)(377454003)(377424004)(6436002)(7696004)(6306002)(54896002)(229853002)(8676002)(2900100001)(76176999)(81166006)(53936002)(38730400002)(345774005)(5660300001)(9686003)(7736002)(54356999)(99286003)(54906002)(74316002)(236005)(733005)(8936002)(53546009)(50986999)(6506006)(66066001)(77096006)(4326008)(25786009)(55016002)(6246003)(19627405001)(3660700001)(3280700002)(189998001)(575784001)(86362001)(2501003)(2950100002)(6116002)(33656002)(122556002)(3846002)(102836003)(6606003)(230783001)(2906002)(18265965002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:CY1PR09MB0636; H:CY1PR09MB0634.namprd09.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en;
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_CY1PR09MB0634018DB677B3D60B82AF84EA1B0CY1PR09MB0634namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: fcc.gov
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 20 Apr 2017 23:35:15.8061 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 72970aed-3669-4ca8-b960-dd016bc72973
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CY1PR09MB0636
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2017-04-20_21:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Reason: safe
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sipcore/gQctis_ni-FTSW5160H2ZaYXeaY>
Subject: Re: [sipcore] Review of draft-ietf-sipcore-status-unwanted-04
X-BeenThere: sipcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Core Working Group <sipcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sipcore/>
List-Post: <mailto:sipcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 23:35:24 -0000

Thank you for your comments. You have captured the spirit of the discussion well [??]


I will be submitting an updated version soon, including your suggestions.


Henning

________________________________
From: Peter Yee <peter@akayla.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2017 11:44:22 PM
To: gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: sipcore@ietf.org; ietf@ietf.org; draft-ietf-sipcore-status-unwanted.all@ietf.org
Subject: Review of draft-ietf-sipcore-status-unwanted-04

Reviewer: Peter Yee
Review result: Ready with Nits

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__trac.ietf.org_trac_gen_wiki_GenArtfaq&d=DwICaQ&c=y0h0omCe0jAUGr4gAQ02Fw&r=FJcVoDkWM5EiVcV0ReX8lDU1XeHIYRHfarpk4MK59RE&m=W4wBo6GdFdfpAg5ssVa_1afyCooA6uWETUt3nUwbQXw&s=UF7qskUlKSBGGMotRXuQPGcmFLyJIvmjjjiMNnXFdNQ&e= >.

Document: draft-ietf-sipcore-status-unwanted-04
Reviewer: Peter Yee
Review Date: 2017-03-21
IETF LC End Date: 2017-03-21
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary: This draft specifies a SIP response code for the callee to
indicate that the call is unwanted.  It goes to great lengths to
specify what may be done as a result of sending this response code,
all the while mandating nothing.

The document has a couple of nits, but nothing seriously wrong.
[Ready with nits]

Major issues: None

Minor issues: None

Nits/editorial comments:

Page 4, 1st full paragraph, 2nd sentence: I can't parse this sentence
as written.  It appears to be a list, but then has a clause (starting
at "based on") that doesn't fit neatly in the sequence.  Perhaps
inserting "and" before "based" would help.  Append "as" after "well".

Page 5, Section 6, 2nd paragraph, 1st sentence: change "extract" to
"exact".

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email