[sipcore] Inconcistency between RFC 7044 and RFC7131

<marianne.mohali@orange.com> Tue, 11 March 2014 16:18 UTC

Return-Path: <marianne.mohali@orange.com>
X-Original-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E8F41A0782 for <sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Mar 2014 09:18:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uljcnFiDvz0N for <sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Mar 2014 09:18:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relais-inet.francetelecom.com (relais-ias243.francetelecom.com [80.12.204.243]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A86381A0780 for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Mar 2014 09:18:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from omfeda08.si.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.201]) by omfeda10.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id BBB37374648; Tue, 11 Mar 2014 17:18:50 +0100 (CET)
Received: from Exchangemail-eme1.itn.ftgroup (unknown [10.114.1.186]) by omfeda08.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 89FF338407E; Tue, 11 Mar 2014 17:18:50 +0100 (CET)
Received: from PEXCVZYM12.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::81f:1640:4749:5d13]) by PEXCVZYH01.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Tue, 11 Mar 2014 17:18:50 +0100
From: marianne.mohali@orange.com
To: "Mary Barnes (mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com)" <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>, "Shida Schubert <shida@agnada.com> (shida@agnada.com)" <shida@agnada.com>, "Christer Holmberg (christer.holmberg@ericsson.com)" <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
Thread-Topic: [sipcore] Inconcistency between RFC 7044 and RFC7131
Thread-Index: Ac89RYg/Z0DspSmyTq+ibXY7knGtiA==
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 16:18:49 +0000
Message-ID: <26837_1394554730_531F376A_26837_9133_1_8B970F90C584EA4E97D5BAAC9172DBB81420EDEF@PEXCVZYM12.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.197.38.6]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_8B970F90C584EA4E97D5BAAC9172DBB81420EDEFPEXCVZYM12corpo_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-PMX-Version: 6.0.3.2322014, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2014.3.11.95118
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sipcore/o2hNwWVof5j0CusyDKk6vjcViyQ
Cc: "sipcore@ietf.org" <sipcore@ietf.org>
Subject: [sipcore] Inconcistency between RFC 7044 and RFC7131
X-BeenThere: sipcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Core Working Group <sipcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sipcore/>
List-Post: <mailto:sipcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 16:18:59 -0000

Hello,

Checking the 2 published RFCs I identified an inconsistency regarding the PBX Voicemail use case recommendation between RFC 7044 and RFC 7131:

RFC 7044 states:

12.1.  PBX Voicemail

The original target is determined by finding the first hi-entry

   tagged with "rc" and using the hi-entry referenced by the index of

   the "rc" header field parameter as the target for determining the

   appropriate mailbox.

RFC 7131 states:
§3.6 PBX Voicemail Example:
The original target is determined by finding the first
   hi-entry tagged with "rc" or "mp" and using the hi-entry referenced
   by the index of "rc" or "mp" header field parameter as the target for
   determining the appropriate mailbox.

Hum hum... I think RFC 7131 is correct. Is that right?

Best Regards,
Marianne


_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.