Re: [sipcore] IPv6 in the sip core wg

"Olle E. Johansson" <oej@edvina.net> Thu, 06 March 2014 14:31 UTC

Return-Path: <oej@edvina.net>
X-Original-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F240F1A03EC for <sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 06:31:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.551
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.551 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uKbgmLQ_x49C for <sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 06:31:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp7.webway.se (smtp7.webway.se [IPv6:2a02:920:212e::205]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED2D81A00DC for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 06:31:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wireless-v6.meeting.ietf.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:67c:370:160:bde9:4194:a7cf:318b]) by smtp7.webway.se (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 6B54D93C2A2; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 14:30:58 +0000 (UTC)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\))
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: "Olle E. Johansson" <oej@edvina.net>
X-Priority: 1
In-Reply-To: <3EA081EC-5F3A-45B9-A27A-D7426B070909@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 14:30:58 +0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F4BEDAFF-60A6-415A-AECC-F011AC30DE08@edvina.net>
References: <C774C9EA-4E79-4846-A834-BF86D2DD8018@edvina.net> <52A7486E.2090005@alum.mit.edu> <FFB57ECD-8CDB-44E9-9A3F-5418AAC01C5B@iii.ca> <26C3B24F-FCBE-4D10-ADD5-E28B6E95A8FB@edvina.net> <BCD747C2-B0E9-492E-97E2-58B078AF5F74@iii.ca> <52A8CFC3.3080309@alum.mit.edu> <CAHBDyN6qK6_Cone+wkrcV_LZCca3b_dbf6rkzwnATZg4R6kn5Q@mail.gmail.com> <52A9F990.1030201@alum.mit.edu> <40B29D11-A4EE-4F7B-97C9-612313CFFB7E@cisco.com> <949EF20990823C4C85C18D59AA11AD8B0F858B@FR712WXCHMBA11.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com> <A054AE81-F690-42DE-8B77-1F7E4F0EA7B1@cisco.com> <949EF20990823C4C85C18D59AA11AD8B0F87DC@FR712WXCHMBA11.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com> <A86516A3-8DAA-43B0-8345-7B26182B99E3@cisco.com> <52AB35A6.8030701@alum.mit.edu> <597D373F-6ACF-4D81-83F0-8CB5A08202E1@cisco.com> <52AF5C0C.9000206@alum.mit.edu> <949EF20990823C4C85C18D59AA11AD8B0FA8CF@FR712WXCHMBA11.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com> <52B1D794.1080602@alum.mit.edu> <52DEF1ED.8040905@nostrum.com> <2AF35782-4049-4AD6-B1E6-A97171DB94EE@cisco.com> <52DEF76B.90 50706@nostrum.com> <BC2BF195-1140-48C4-AF4E-C4CC6951E2FB@cisco.com> <53C92953-3CC0-4738-A41F-61EEF3853514@cisco.com> <3EA081EC-5F3A-45B9-A27A-D7426B070909@cisco.com>
To: "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sipcore/ai7sUk-P4rCECqEwvAfsUPLkoBQ
Cc: SIPCORE WG <sipcore@ietf.org>, Olle E Johansson <oej@edvina.net>, "Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)" <gsalguei@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [sipcore] IPv6 in the sip core wg
X-BeenThere: sipcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Core Working Group <sipcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sipcore/>
List-Post: <mailto:sipcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 14:31:06 -0000

Ok for me.

/O
On 06 Mar 2014, at 14:25, Cullen Jennings (fluffy) <fluffy@cisco.com> wrote:

> 
> Works for me
> 
> On Mar 6, 2014, at 2:18 PM, Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei) <gsalguei@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
>> As per our discussion during the meeting...
>> 
>> I propose we narrow the scope of the proposed milestone to better suit the existing work.  The following two word edit is proposed:
>> 
>> OLD:
>> 
>> June 2014  Request publication of procedures for dual-stack client and server handling of SIP URIs
>> 
>> 
>> June 2014  Request publication of DNS look-up procedures for dual-stack client and server handling of SIP URIs
>> 
>> 
>> Are folks ok with this new text?  After further study of SIP dual-stack gaps, as Dan York proposed we do, we can add appropriately scoped milestones as they arise.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> 
>> Gonzalo
>> 
>> 
>> On Jan 21, 2014, at 10:42 PM, Cullen Jennings (fluffy) <fluffy@cisco.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> works for me
>>> 
>>> On Jan 21, 2014, at 3:40 PM, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On 1/21/14 16:24, Cullen Jennings (fluffy) wrote:
>>>>> No, that implies that 3263 and 6157 are wrong and products that implement need to change - If you want that milestone, first you need to be able be clear about what is wrong with 3263 or 6157.  How about
>>>>> 
>>>>>> June 2014  Request publication of procedures for dual-stack client and server handling of SIP URIs
>>>> 
>>>> That runs the risk of being confused with what 6157 already does. How about:
>>>> 
>>>> June 2014 Request publication of Happy Eyeballs procedures for handling of SIP URIs
>>>> 
>>>> Which seems a fair summary of what Olle and Gonzalo's current document intends to do.
>>>> 
>>>> /a
>>> 
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> sipcore mailing list
> sipcore@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore