IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sipcore] IPv6 in the sip core wg

Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com> Tue, 10 December 2013 15:19 UTC

Return-Path: <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E28701ADF8B for <sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 07:19:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8HWbCVfl3gs5 for <sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 07:19:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-we0-x22e.google.com (mail-we0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22e]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 637731AE0CF for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 07:19:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-we0-f174.google.com with SMTP id q58so5148067wes.33 for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 07:19:02 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=xlVGgjVX26YhTNAxJnydG1i5iOzeQXqK8zx+F00iiuQ=; b=Gd+sDJhO/PyB32Mzjny2k1Q2aNmHVs52YOhrclg6OcQ0KU8DL0WGCaSCrZ8tPU+i5Z 44B1KpAUdkkuX7dOW2Zmv0NBjAiSg6dvbjXVbrUk8ic5Bx/1/VhrkCuScqfScWgC4IwS WLLvnlbVZ6hX71CBxRvy5AVO/2QOHd58g00RXA60JZfAXRb29SFq5mwqncW5bn9JvbSa xHwjaFucopF/yOYVvg8lTDPU5oEGFj9eFfLhFhCqpWEz280f+nmjdv94PbPE7VhFt04T zcar3aZIQ9f9aPAxHx2T8MPbRNjQRvGsqIIqRXRSDGwA4eA7hmvsxw7qQYBh8Xu15vky MsAw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.188.229 with SMTP id gd5mr20005862wic.38.1386688742757; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 07:19:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.216.172.9 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 07:19:02 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <86897DAD-AEAE-4EEC-BCEC-D8501D8491D2@cisco.com>
References: <C774C9EA-4E79-4846-A834-BF86D2DD8018@edvina.net> <52A2094E.8020009@alum.mit.edu> <86897DAD-AEAE-4EEC-BCEC-D8501D8491D2@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 09:19:02 -0600
Message-ID: <CAHBDyN7AT0m7P5miYa+hCvh55Ov3f1Nc-U1zUK6H-0i4aHTW+g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>
To: "Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)" <gsalguei@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c37e8eed1aa704ed2fa15d"
Cc: "sipcore@ietf.org" <sipcore@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sipcore] IPv6 in the sip core wg
X-BeenThere: sipcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Core Working Group <sipcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sipcore/>
List-Post: <mailto:sipcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 15:19:11 -0000

On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 10:49 PM, Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei) <
gsalguei@cisco.com> wrote:

> Paul -
>
> On Dec 6, 2013, at 12:28 PM, Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
>
> > Olle,
> >
> > Yes, this is something it seems evident we should take on.
> > I don't believe we need to change the "charter", but we should add a
> milestone for this.
> >
> > If you would like to propose milestone text (in the same style as the
> existing milestones) and take a first guess at a date for it, that would be
> great.
>
> How about:
>
> Apr 2014  Amended procedures for dual-stack server handling of SIP URIs
> containing domain names
>
[MB] I would suggest to just use the term "Updated" as opposed to "Amended".
While all of our dates are always optimistic, I think June 2014 is probably
beyond the usually level of optimism, since that's the date for the doc to
go to the IESG.   It often takes at least 2 months to get a doc from WGLC
to ready for IESG review.  That would mean the document completes WGLC in
February 2014.  If you think that's possible, then April is fine, but I
would anticipate that it could take a tad longer.
[/MB]

>
> >
> > Now that we have this, and some other things, that are on the table we
> are planning on having a sipcore session in London. This will be one (or
> more) of the agenda items for that meeting.
>
> Sounds good.
>
> Gonzalo
>
> >
> >       Thanks,
> >       Paul
> >
> > On 12/6/13 8:20 AM, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >> Coming back to an earlier discussion, it seemed to me that we had a few
> people that supported adding IPv6 dual stack issues to the charter of this
> wg - if it's not in there already.
> >>
> >> I would like to propose that we add this to the charter and that we
> plan a meeting at the IETF in London to discuss this and happy eyeballs
> issues.
> >>
> >> We have two drafts in the pipeline and one that should have been
> written about the actual happy eyeballs connection setup, but currently
> only exists as promiseware...
> >>
> >> /O
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> sipcore mailing list
> >> sipcore@ietf.org
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > sipcore mailing list
> > sipcore@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore
>
> _______________________________________________
> sipcore mailing list
> sipcore@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email