IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sipcore] IPv6 in the sip core wg

"Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)" <gsalguei@cisco.com> Tue, 10 December 2013 04:49 UTC

Return-Path: <gsalguei@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 865211AE1AD for <sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 20:49:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.502
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.502 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4_b5Gx4-eLN7 for <sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 20:49:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-4.cisco.com (alln-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.142.91]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02FC41AE1A8 for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 20:49:43 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1732; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1386650979; x=1387860579; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=8UAEXGcEtuF/4e3C7HdPDS4fQU0TIXwORMAs3inskeM=; b=J8CST60FVihqyJACww9OtWQNfBgV3mf7o84JLns7+Fj5NYq78kwdJCeM voYmsmnejNFUyY0Nw7lAPQWaSfjX/R+w6bCawGodRITUgXX/Z+CMiMM/f lm/SsnoYj0YSD3+KEelUZit1MIrcIOVmhJZqam4gA7jkSEMngp4DvJwHI o=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgUFAImcplKtJV2d/2dsb2JhbABZDoJ5OFO4RU6BIxZ0giUBAQEDAQEBATc0CwULAgEIDgoeECcLJQIEDgWHfAYNwEUTBI48ITMHgyCBEwOYFJITgmo/gio
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.93,863,1378857600"; d="scan'208";a="5579864"
Received: from rcdn-core-6.cisco.com ([173.37.93.157]) by alln-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 10 Dec 2013 04:49:38 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x02.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x02.cisco.com [173.37.183.76]) by rcdn-core-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id rBA4ncao022447 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 10 Dec 2013 04:49:38 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com ([169.254.8.232]) by xhc-rcd-x02.cisco.com ([173.37.183.76]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 22:49:38 -0600
From: "Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)" <gsalguei@cisco.com>
To: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
Thread-Topic: [sipcore] IPv6 in the sip core wg
Thread-Index: AQHO8oXtPaG9LxtinkCT+HMY0fMEHZpH0MUAgAV1OYA=
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 04:49:37 +0000
Message-ID: <86897DAD-AEAE-4EEC-BCEC-D8501D8491D2@cisco.com>
References: <C774C9EA-4E79-4846-A834-BF86D2DD8018@edvina.net> <52A2094E.8020009@alum.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <52A2094E.8020009@alum.mit.edu>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.82.246.129]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <F5F04A3946369E4E99233A751C3556A5@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "sipcore@ietf.org" <sipcore@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sipcore] IPv6 in the sip core wg
X-BeenThere: sipcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Core Working Group <sipcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sipcore/>
List-Post: <mailto:sipcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 04:49:45 -0000

Paul - 

On Dec 6, 2013, at 12:28 PM, Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu> wrote:

> Olle,
> 
> Yes, this is something it seems evident we should take on.
> I don't believe we need to change the "charter", but we should add a milestone for this.
> 
> If you would like to propose milestone text (in the same style as the existing milestones) and take a first guess at a date for it, that would be great.

How about:

Apr 2014  Amended procedures for dual-stack server handling of SIP URIs containing domain names

> 
> Now that we have this, and some other things, that are on the table we are planning on having a sipcore session in London. This will be one (or more) of the agenda items for that meeting.

Sounds good.

Gonzalo

> 
> 	Thanks,
> 	Paul
> 
> On 12/6/13 8:20 AM, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
>> Hi!
>> 
>> Coming back to an earlier discussion, it seemed to me that we had a few people that supported adding IPv6 dual stack issues to the charter of this wg - if it's not in there already.
>> 
>> I would like to propose that we add this to the charter and that we plan a meeting at the IETF in London to discuss this and happy eyeballs issues.
>> 
>> We have two drafts in the pipeline and one that should have been written about the actual happy eyeballs connection setup, but currently only exists as promiseware...
>> 
>> /O
>> _______________________________________________
>> sipcore mailing list
>> sipcore@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> sipcore mailing list
> sipcore@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email