IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sipcore] IPv6 in the sip core wg

"Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg@bell-labs.com> Wed, 22 January 2014 15:41 UTC

Return-Path: <vkg@bell-labs.com>
X-Original-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB65D1A00EC for <sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 07:41:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WnjNy--2HhuE for <sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 07:41:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ihemail3.lucent.com (ihemail3.lucent.com [135.245.0.37]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFC971A00CF for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 07:41:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from usnavsmail3.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com (usnavsmail3.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com [135.3.39.11]) by ihemail3.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id s0MFf4dS000420 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 22 Jan 2014 09:41:05 -0600 (CST)
Received: from umail.lucent.com (umail.ndc.lucent.com [135.3.40.61]) by usnavsmail3.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/GMO) with ESMTP id s0MFf46M007545 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 22 Jan 2014 09:41:04 -0600
Received: from shoonya.ih.lucent.com (shoonya.ih.lucent.com [135.185.237.229]) by umail.lucent.com (8.13.8/TPES) with ESMTP id s0MFese9000677; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 09:40:55 -0600 (CST)
Message-ID: <52DFE6B8.3010903@bell-labs.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 09:41:44 -0600
From: "Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg@bell-labs.com>
Organization: Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>, "Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)" <gsalguei@cisco.com>, "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com>, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
References: <C774C9EA-4E79-4846-A834-BF86D2DD8018@edvina.net> <52A8CFC3.3080309@alum.mit.edu> <CAHBDyN6qK6_Cone+wkrcV_LZCca3b_dbf6rkzwnATZg4R6kn5Q@mail.gmail.com> <52A9F990.1030201@alum.mit.edu> <40B29D11-A4EE-4F7B-97C9-612313CFFB7E@cisco.com> <949EF20990823C4C85C18D59AA11AD8B0F858B@FR712WXCHMBA11.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com> <A054AE81-F690-42DE-8B77-1F7E4F0EA7B1@cisco.com> <949EF20990823C4C85C18D59AA11AD8B0F87DC@FR712WXCHMBA11.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com> <A86516A3-8DAA-43B0-8345-7B26182B99E3@cisco.com> <52AB35A6.8030701@alum.mit.edu> <597D373F-6ACF-4D81-83F0-8CB5A08202E1@cisco.com> <52AF5C0C.9000206@alum.mit.edu> <949EF20990823C4C85C18D59AA11AD8B0FA8CF@FR712WXCHMBA11.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com> <52B1D794.1080602@alum.mit.edu> <52DEF1ED.8040905@nostrum.com> <2AF35782-4049-4AD6-B1E6-A97171DB94EE@cisco.com> <52DEF76B.9050706@nostrum.com> <BC2BF195-1140-48C4-AF4E-C4CC6951E2FB@cisco.com> <35FC50F7-B473-4B2B-8A49-FD23330755D3@cisco.com> <52DF1EFF.6080701@alum.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <52DF1EFF.6080701@alum.mit.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 135.245.2.37
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 135.3.39.11
Cc: SIPCORE WG <sipcore@ietf.org>, Olle E Johansson <oej@edvina.net>
Subject: Re: [sipcore] IPv6 in the sip core wg
X-BeenThere: sipcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Core Working Group <sipcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sipcore/>
List-Post: <mailto:sipcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 15:41:46 -0000

On 01/21/2014 07:29 PM, Paul Kyzivat wrote:
> I'm ok with this if it settles the rift.

I liked Paul's original text better, and I suspected that there
was some consensus to it, no?

In any case, it is not worth having another debate that holds up
progress.  Whether or not draft-johansson-sip-dual-stack updates
only rfc3263 or updates both rfc3253 and rfc6157 can be determined
as the work progresses.

As such, if folks are happy with "Request publication of Happy Eyeballs
procedures for handling of SIP URIs" then lets proceed.

Thanks,

- vijay
-- 
Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60563 (USA)
Email: vkg@{bell-labs.com,acm.org} / vijay.gurbani@alcatel-lucent.com
Web: http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/  | Calendar: http://goo.gl/x3Ogq

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email