[sipcore] Updates to 4244bis-05

Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com> Thu, 28 April 2011 21:29 UTC

Return-Path: <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3765AE06C3 for <sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 14:29:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.056
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.056 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.542, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dJH6itojOQhw for <sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 14:29:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gx0-f172.google.com (mail-gx0-f172.google.com [209.85.161.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31096E06DC for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 14:29:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by gxk19 with SMTP id 19so1435972gxk.31 for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 14:29:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type; bh=bOOFJGa1NqECrin5QH/zTRN/9OyxRuS2AidwasdJLg0=; b=GCa1HQ7VKOkvBuKzsATLAk3Lw6qYR+Vijv7hCl1xEXCFfgfHCLZW/AUGmP0vyUPpOh IpmO+BGt81LwoJC3gvfkq9VkPp+CZggt8O8L4bofvIj5niMiFIN0YKs4iATvjFYK70fv hOzNuWke0MYHkuxoSaByl4te4v14LD9LspnDo=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=hUy5k3QukDd7fx35ecdsK6LoaCLVjABWV1ya6ilHr0qUcsPb7gA++jJqcKDVDbby/C 0Ktw14fB7qTD3j9oGYFUYJi2DG4qjJL0ctohq2Cu9F9PftpxvNIr3Poaqdn5cvaUOIDB 5g5ac6/D/61NYOttufiWeK2FG/PWr4pBEGsBw=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.236.190.9 with SMTP id d9mr5159565yhn.371.1304026147595; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 14:29:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.236.110.34 with HTTP; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 14:29:07 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 16:29:07 -0500
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=-rZ1j6RwzMYATeo2WkqksdoV6ZQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>
To: SIPCORE <sipcore@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="20cf305e24f74e26f304a2013fa5"
Cc: SIPCORE Chairs <sipcore-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, Shida Schubert <shida@agnada.com>
Subject: [sipcore] Updates to 4244bis-05
X-BeenThere: sipcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Core Working Group <sipcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sipcore>
List-Post: <mailto:sipcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 21:29:09 -0000

Hi folks,

We have made the following updates to
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sipcore-rfc4244bis/ based on WG
feedback:

1) Lots of editorial/clarifications per John Elwell's comments:


2) Updated section 9.3 (receiving responses) to also include timeouts and
updated to reflect that we don't add the Reason header in the case of 2xx
responses.

3) Updated section 10.2 (Reason header) to be consistent with the header
being added to the hi-entry in the cache (in section 9.3) - i.e., removed
references to retargeting.

4) Added text in Security considerations with regards to needing a Privacy
Service per RFC 3323 to ensure that the privacy is applied.

The diff is a reasonable way to review the changes:
http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-sipcore-rfc4244bis-05.txt

The document should be ready for another WGLC.

Note, that for some reason there was no announcement to the WG mailing list
when the document was submitted yesterday.

Thanks,
Mary.