[Sipping-emergency] Does validation make coordinates obsolete?
"James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com> Wed, 29 September 2004 00:51 UTC
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA10303 for <sipping-emergency-web-archive@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 20:51:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CCSoi-0008AL-5o for sipping-emergency-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 20:59:37 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CCSY9-0001tj-2q; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 20:42:29 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CCSNG-00073n-Dl for sipping-emergency@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 20:31:14 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA08945 for <sipping-emergency@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 20:31:12 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sj-iport-4.cisco.com ([171.68.10.86]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CCSVB-0007jk-AL for sipping-emergency@ietf.org; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 20:39:26 -0400
Received: from sj-core-3.cisco.com (171.68.223.137) by sj-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 28 Sep 2004 17:31:14 -0700
X-BrightmailFiltered: true
Received: from wells.cisco.com (wells.cisco.com [171.71.177.223]) by sj-core-3.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i8T0Ue3c010906 for <sipping-emergency@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:30:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jmpolk-w2k01.diablo.cisco.com (ssh-sjc-1.cisco.com [171.68.225.134]) by wells.cisco.com (8.8.6 (PHNE_14041)/CISCO.SERVER.1.2) with ESMTP id RAA20877 for <sipping-emergency@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:30:39 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20040928191224.033abed0@localhost>
X-Sender: jmpolk@localhost
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 19:30:40 -0500
To: sipping-emergency@ietf.org
From: "James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-Spam-Score: 1.1 (+)
X-Scan-Signature: 856eb5f76e7a34990d1d457d8e8e5b7f
Subject: [Sipping-emergency] Does validation make coordinates obsolete?
X-BeenThere: sipping-emergency@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: sipping-emergency.ietf.org
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping-emergency>, <mailto:sipping-emergency-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:sipping-emergency@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipping-emergency-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping-emergency>, <mailto:sipping-emergency-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: sipping-emergency-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: sipping-emergency-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 1.1 (+)
X-Scan-Signature: 7655788c23eb79e336f5f8ba8bce7906
Since some on this list have been claiming validation is a mandatory
function of calling for (911-type) assistance, why would coordinates ever
be used again?
This is troubling for many reasons, not the least of which is the fact that
the PIDF-LO ID (in the RFC-Editor now) states coordinates are the default
location conveyance (not civil addressing).
Validation of coordinates makes no sense to most, and I feel validation of
civil addressing is a false sense of verification.
cheers,
James
*******************
Truth is not to be argued... it is to be presented
_______________________________________________
Sipping-emergency mailing list
Sipping-emergency@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping-emergency
- [Sipping-emergency] Does validation make coordina… James M. Polk