Re: [Sipping] Question on draft-ietf-sipping-v6-transition-07

"Dale Worley" <dworley@avaya.com> Fri, 05 February 2010 19:29 UTC

Return-Path: <dworley@avaya.com>
X-Original-To: sipping@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipping@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7574328C0E3 for <sipping@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Feb 2010 11:29:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7K2Txg279-0t for <sipping@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Feb 2010 11:29:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p-us1-iereast-outbound-tmp.us1.avaya.com (p-us1-iereast-outbound-tmp.us1.avaya.com [135.11.29.16]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44E0C28C0E0 for <sipping@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Feb 2010 11:29:07 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,414,1262581200"; d="scan'208";a="2568708"
Received: from unknown (HELO co300216-co-erhwest.avaya.com) ([198.152.7.5]) by p-us1-iereast-outbound-tmp.us1.avaya.com with ESMTP; 05 Feb 2010 14:29:57 -0500
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,414,1262581200"; d="scan'208";a="442986022"
Received: from unknown (HELO zcars04f.nortel.com) ([47.129.242.57]) by co300216-co-erhwest-out.avaya.com with ESMTP; 05 Feb 2010 14:29:56 -0500
Received: from zcars04e.nortel.com (zcars04e.nortel.com [47.129.242.56]) by zcars04f.nortel.com (Switch-2.2.6/Switch-2.2.0) with ESMTP id o15JTal13860; Fri, 5 Feb 2010 19:29:36 GMT
Received: from zrtphxs1.corp.nortel.com (zrtphxs1.corp.nortel.com [47.140.202.46]) by zcars04e.nortel.com (Switch-2.2.0/Switch-2.2.0) with ESMTP id o15JTX719162; Fri, 5 Feb 2010 19:29:33 GMT
Received: from [47.141.31.232] ([47.141.31.232]) by zrtphxs1.corp.nortel.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 5 Feb 2010 14:29:32 -0500
From: Dale Worley <dworley@avaya.com>
To: "Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg@bell-labs.com>
In-Reply-To: <4B6B2FF0.5030007@bell-labs.com>
References: <A444A0F8084434499206E78C106220CAB4EC49D8@MCHP058A.global-ad.net> <4B61E8AE.6090309@alcatel-lucent.com> <A444A0F8084434499206E78C106220CAB4EC49F5@MCHP058A.global-ad.net> <4B61EEFE.3030605@alcatel-lucent.com> <A444A0F8084434499206E78C106220CAB920FE16@MCHP058A.global-ad.net> <4B6B2FF0.5030007@bell-labs.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Organization: Nortel Networks
Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2010 14:29:31 -0500
Message-Id: <1265398172.5694.31.camel@khone.us.nortel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.3 (2.12.3-5.fc8)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Feb 2010 19:29:33.0128 (UTC) FILETIME=[8B54D480:01CAA699]
Cc: "Elwell, John" <john.elwell@siemens-enterprise.com>, "sipping@ietf.org" <sipping@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Sipping] Question on draft-ietf-sipping-v6-transition-07
X-BeenThere: sipping@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "SIPPING Working Group \(applications of SIP\)" <sipping.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping>, <mailto:sipping-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sipping>
List-Post: <mailto:sipping@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipping-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping>, <mailto:sipping-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2010 19:29:08 -0000

On Thu, 2010-02-04 at 14:37 -0600, Vijay K. Gurbani wrote:
> On 02/03/2010 10:07 AM, Elwell, John wrote:
> > Presumably just "invalid" (alone, as opposed to "xxxx.invalid" would be legal?
> 
> John: I think ".invalid" itself suffices, but I will defer to Gonzalo's
> view on this.

Why have we put a leading "." on "invalid"?  We do not write, e.g.,
".bell-labs.com".  I know of no other place where a domain name is
written with a leading period.

Dale