Re: [Sipping] Question on draft-ietf-sipping-v6-transition-07
"Elwell, John" <john.elwell@siemens-enterprise.com> Fri, 05 February 2010 16:43 UTC
Return-Path: <john.elwell@siemens-enterprise.com>
X-Original-To: sipping@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipping@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B770C3A6B15 for <sipping@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Feb 2010 08:43:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.548
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.548 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.051, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rZd43p7MGkQU for <sipping@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Feb 2010 08:43:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ms04.m0019.fra.mmp.de.bt.com (m0019.fra.mmp.de.bt.com [62.180.227.30]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A831E3A687B for <sipping@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Feb 2010 08:43:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from senmx12-mx ([62.134.46.10] [62.134.46.10]) by ms04.m0020.fra.mmp.de.bt.com with ESMTP id BT-MMP-796022; Fri, 5 Feb 2010 17:44:08 +0100
Received: from MCHP064A.global-ad.net (unknown [172.29.37.63]) by senmx12-mx (Server) with ESMTP id 071AD23F0296; Fri, 5 Feb 2010 17:44:08 +0100 (CET)
Received: from MCHP058A.global-ad.net ([172.29.37.55]) by MCHP064A.global-ad.net ([172.29.37.63]) with mapi; Fri, 5 Feb 2010 17:44:07 +0100
From: "Elwell, John" <john.elwell@siemens-enterprise.com>
To: "Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg@alcatel-lucent.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2010 17:44:06 +0100
Thread-Topic: [Sipping] Question on draft-ietf-sipping-v6-transition-07
Thread-Index: AcqmgL6OsSm/efVLQzKI8pw2eEyOHAAASQsw
Message-ID: <A444A0F8084434499206E78C106220CAB9299687@MCHP058A.global-ad.net>
References: <A444A0F8084434499206E78C106220CAB4EC49D8@MCHP058A.global-ad.net> <4B61E8AE.6090309@alcatel-lucent.com> <A444A0F8084434499206E78C106220CAB4EC49F5@MCHP058A.global-ad.net> <4B61EEFE.3030605@alcatel-lucent.com> <A444A0F8084434499206E78C106220CAB920FE16@MCHP058A.global-ad.net> <4B6B2FF0.5030007@bell-labs.com> <A444A0F8084434499206E78C106220CAB9210933@MCHP058A.global-ad.net> <4B6C47FF.2020400@alcatel-lucent.com>
In-Reply-To: <4B6C47FF.2020400@alcatel-lucent.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "sipping@ietf.org" <sipping@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Sipping] Question on draft-ietf-sipping-v6-transition-07
X-BeenThere: sipping@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "SIPPING Working Group \(applications of SIP\)" <sipping.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping>, <mailto:sipping-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sipping>
List-Post: <mailto:sipping@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipping-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping>, <mailto:sipping-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2010 16:43:18 -0000
Vijay, Yes, I know we are talking SDP, but the SDP ABNF was so imprecise that I looked elsewhere. I am not sure where the definitive source is, but I just took SIP as an example, which seemed to suggest that the people who wrote RFC 3261 thought that a single element (without any dot) was wrong. This could mean that if you take a single element and use it as input to the DNS mechanism, you get the wrong outcome, and hence including a single element in SDP would be equally wrong. Kevin's message seems to support that belief. John > -----Original Message----- > From: Vijay K. Gurbani [mailto:vkg@alcatel-lucent.com] > Sent: 05 February 2010 16:32 > To: Elwell, John > Cc: sipping@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [Sipping] Question on draft-ietf-sipping-v6-transition-07 > > Elwell, John wrote: > > Thanks, but I was concerned that a domain name beginning with "." > > might be wrong; Taking the SIP ABNF as an example (SDP ABNF isn't so > > precise), we have: > > > > hostname = *( domainlabel "." ) toplabel [ "." ] > > John: Quite true. However, in the case we are talking about, > the ".invalid" appears in the SDP, which is governed by the > SDP ABNF. The ".invalid" is not appearing in the URI, but > in the "c=" line in SDP. > > The SDP ABNF in rfc4566 has this grammar for the > "c=" line: > > connection-field = [%x63 "=" nettype SP addrtype SP > connection-address CRLF] > connection-address = multicast-address / unicast-address > unicast-address = IP4-address / IP6-address / FQDN / extn-addr > extn-addr = non-ws-string > non-ws-string = 1*(VCHAR/%x80-FF) > ;string of visible characters > > Does not ".invalid" in the SDP result from the extn-addr > production rule above? Consequently, should it not be legal? > Or am I missing something here? > > Thanks, > > - vijay > -- > Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent > 1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60566 (USA) > Email: vkg@{alcatel-lucent.com,bell-labs.com,acm.org} > Web: http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/ >
- [Sipping] Question on draft-ietf-sipping-v6-trans… Elwell, John
- Re: [Sipping] Question on draft-ietf-sipping-v6-t… Vijay K. Gurbani
- Re: [Sipping] Question on draft-ietf-sipping-v6-t… Elwell, John
- Re: [Sipping] Question on draft-ietf-sipping-v6-t… Vijay K. Gurbani
- Re: [Sipping] Question on draft-ietf-sipping-v6-t… Elwell, John
- Re: [Sipping] Question on draft-ietf-sipping-v6-t… Elwell, John
- Re: [Sipping] Question on draft-ietf-sipping-v6-t… Dale Worley
- Re: [Sipping] Question on draft-ietf-sipping-v6-t… Elwell, John
- Re: [Sipping] Question on draft-ietf-sipping-v6-t… Kevin P. Fleming
- Re: [Sipping] Question on draft-ietf-sipping-v6-t… Elwell, John
- Re: [Sipping] Question on draft-ietf-sipping-v6-t… Vijay K. Gurbani
- Re: [Sipping] Question on draft-ietf-sipping-v6-t… Vijay K. Gurbani
- Re: [Sipping] Question on draft-ietf-sipping-v6-t… Elwell, John
- Re: [Sipping] Question on draft-ietf-sipping-v6-t… Vijay K. Gurbani
- Re: [Sipping] Question on draft-ietf-sipping-v6-t… Dale Worley
- Re: [Sipping] Question on draft-ietf-sipping-v6-t… Somogyi, Gabor (NSN - HU/Budapest)
- Re: [Sipping] Question on draft-ietf-sipping-v6-t… Dale Worley