Re: [Sipping] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5359 (7718)

Rebecca VanRheenen <rvanrheenen@amsl.com> Fri, 01 December 2023 18:03 UTC

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
From: Rebecca VanRheenen <rvanrheenen@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20231201162728.0E79F1976013@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2023 10:03:45 -0800
Cc: rocherfabien@yahoo.fr, alan@sipstation.com, RjS@nostrum.com, chrcunni@cisco.com, srd@cisco.com, ksummers@sonusnet.com, sipping@ietf.org, RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <6F0744FD-2931-44DC-9CC7-9762E6B1611F@amsl.com>
References: <20231201162728.0E79F1976013@rfcpa.amsl.com>
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>, Francesca Palombini <francesca.palombini@ericsson.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sipping/zNueHmWCzivMzTkcrzKss4kUkCA>
Subject: Re: [Sipping] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5359 (7718)
Precedence: list

Hi Murray and Francesca,

We are unable to verify this erratum that the submitter marked as editorial. Please note that we have changed the “Type” of the following errata report to “Technical”.  As Stream Approver, please review and set the Status and Type accordingly (see the definitions at https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata-definitions/).

You may review the report at: 
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7718

Note: We are sending this to you as ADs of the ART area as the sipping Working Group (was part of the RAI Area) has concluded.

Please see https://www.rfc-editor.org/how-to-verify/ for further information on how to verify errata reports.

Further information on errata can be found at: 
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata.php

Thank you.

RFC Editor/rv


> On Dec 1, 2023, at 8:27 AM, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5359,
> "Session Initiation Protocol Service Examples".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7718
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Fabien R. <rocherfabien@yahoo.fr>
> 
> Section: 2.1 Call Hold
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
> In the diagram:
>             |           No RTP Sent!        |
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>             |           One way RTP         |
>             |<==============================|
> 
> Notes
> -----
> If we follow the explanation next to the diagram, the RTP flow should be 'unidirectionnal' after the hold because F10 is using a=sendonly and F12 a=recvonly.
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". (If it is spam, it 
> will be removed shortly by the RFC Production Center.) Please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
> will log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC5359 (draft-ietf-sipping-service-examples-15)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Session Initiation Protocol Service Examples
> Publication Date    : October 2008
> Author(s)           : A. Johnston, Ed., R. Sparks, C. Cunningham, S. Donovan, K. Summers
> Category            : BEST CURRENT PRACTICE
> Source              : Session Initiation Proposal Investigation
> Area                : Real-time Applications and Infrastructure
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>

Re: [Sipping] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5359… Rebecca VanRheenen