[Sipping] [Errata Rejected] RFC5359 (7718)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Fri, 01 December 2023 18:55 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: sipping@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipping@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB0B4C14E513; Fri, 1 Dec 2023 10:55:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.658
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.658 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JbJoCTAZg9Yo; Fri, 1 Dec 2023 10:55:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfcpa.amsl.com [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AFBC2C14F5EA; Fri, 1 Dec 2023 10:53:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 78650E43BC; Fri, 1 Dec 2023 10:53:30 -0800 (PST)
To: rocherfabien@yahoo.fr, alan@sipstation.com, RjS@nostrum.com, chrcunni@cisco.com, srd@cisco.com, ksummers@sonusnet.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: superuser@gmail.com, iesg@ietf.org, sipping@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20231201185330.78650E43BC@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2023 10:53:30 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sipping/MU4V2LdcdL9IP1PNcYNUPmNs91A>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 11 Dec 2023 10:50:28 -0800
Subject: [Sipping] [Errata Rejected] RFC5359 (7718)
X-BeenThere: sipping@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "SIPPING Working Group \(applications of SIP\)" <sipping.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sipping>, <mailto:sipping-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sipping/>
List-Post: <mailto:sipping@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipping-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping>, <mailto:sipping-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2023 18:55:07 -0000
The following errata report has been rejected for RFC5359, "Session Initiation Protocol Service Examples". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7718 -------------------------------------- Status: Rejected Type: Technical Reported by: Fabien R. <rocherfabien@yahoo.fr> Date Reported: 2023-12-01 Rejected by: Murray Kucherawy (IESG) Section: 2.1 Original Text ------------- | No RTP Sent! | Corrected Text -------------- | One way RTP | |<==============================| Notes ----- If we follow the explanation next to the diagram, the RTP flow should be 'unidirectionnal' after the hold because F10 is using a=sendonly and F12 a=recvonly. [AD Note, forwarded from Robert Sparks:] The existing text explains and it is intentional that the diagram claims that no media is sent. --VERIFIER NOTES-- -------------------------------------- RFC5359 (draft-ietf-sipping-service-examples-15) -------------------------------------- Title : Session Initiation Protocol Service Examples Publication Date : October 2008 Author(s) : A. Johnston, Ed., R. Sparks, C. Cunningham, S. Donovan, K. Summers Category : BEST CURRENT PRACTICE Source : Session Initiation Proposal Investigation Area : Real-time Applications and Infrastructure Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [Sipping] [Errata Rejected] RFC5359 (7718) RFC Errata System