Re: [siprec] draft-ram-siprec-callflows-01

"Parthasarathi R" <partha@parthasarathi.co.in> Mon, 22 October 2012 16:36 UTC

Return-Path: <partha@parthasarathi.co.in>
X-Original-To: siprec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: siprec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2643021F8B70 for <siprec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 09:36:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.712
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.712 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.714, BAYES_50=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3S9DukLf-N-b for <siprec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 09:36:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outbound-us1.mailhostbox.com (outbound-us1.mailhostbox.com [70.87.28.138]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1B4021F8B7E for <siprec@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 09:36:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from userPC (unknown [122.179.43.209]) (Authenticated sender: partha@parthasarathi.co.in) by outbound-us1.mailhostbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 30B5F1EBFDFA; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 16:36:12 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=parthasarathi.co.in; s=20120823; t=1350923776; bh=RqiAXADBhBh6x7A274e1ZEXZOiI3rB6hFrKU4QDHb2E=; h=From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=XibeArVDUayUN3b09CiK5t8O+o/v6gHIPMTo0WDOjssXWnvKKt8u4YAcRFVj91RqN 27kWhniy1JaJ4394vPN8NZjdnCGZLefEUSojYpbr4mQaRPq989oeguz7ZzZP5Qu90O Tke3HJCAzfhR8QcAVSMES+53eumJpTfq9GexPM4A=
From: Parthasarathi R <partha@parthasarathi.co.in>
To: 'Ofir Roth' <Ofir.Roth@nice.com>, siprec@ietf.org
References: <D6FF53BFD24F6F448C70DEF68DB4E6655A8BC055A3@TLVMBX01.nice.com> <003401cdac7b$f98d3bf0$eca7b3d0$@co.in> <D6FF53BFD24F6F448C70DEF68DB4E6655A8BC75BD1@TLVMBX01.nice.com>
In-Reply-To: <D6FF53BFD24F6F448C70DEF68DB4E6655A8BC75BD1@TLVMBX01.nice.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 22:05:57 +0530
Message-ID: <007d01cdb073$5ac65f50$10531df0$@co.in>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_007E_01CDB0A1.747E9B50"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: Ac2sV49ORvpLdO1+SSymgnCxmyNtBQAIdO/AAGyk/3AAkb7KIA==
Content-Language: en-us
X-CTCH-Spam: Suspect
X-CTCH-VOD: Unknown
X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A0B0203.50857600.00C4, ss=2, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=2, cld=1, fgs=64
Subject: Re: [siprec] draft-ram-siprec-callflows-01
X-BeenThere: siprec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Recording Working Group Discussion List <siprec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/siprec>, <mailto:siprec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/siprec>
List-Post: <mailto:siprec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:siprec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/siprec>, <mailto:siprec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 16:36:18 -0000

Hi Ofir,

 

Thanks for the review. Please read inline.

 

Thanks

Partha

 

From: Ofir Roth [mailto:Ofir.Roth@nice.com] 
Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2012 12:36 AM
To: Parthasarathi R; siprec@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [siprec] draft-ram-siprec-callflows-01

 

Hi,

 

According to the metadata scheme: 

 

<xs:complexType name="participant">

       <xs:sequence>

           <xs:element name="nameID" type="nameID"

             maxOccurs="1"/>

        <xs:any namespace='##other'

                   minOccurs='0'

                   maxOccurs='unbounded'

                   processContents='lax'/>

       </xs:sequence>

       <xs:attribute name="participant_id" type="xs:base64Binary"

            use="required"/>

       <xs:attribute name="session_id" type="xs:base64Binary"

            use="required"/>

   </xs:complexType>

There is no associate/disassociate time as part of the participant
definition while it appears in the call flow example of section 4.5.

<Partha> This is callflow document issue and the actual XML element is
participantsessionassoc. This is updated in -02 callflow draft </Partha>

 

And session is defined as follow:

 

<xs:complexType name="session">

       <xs:sequence>

         <xs:element name="reason" type="xs:string"

                minOccurs="0"/>

         <xs:element name="group-ref" type="xs:base64Binary"

                minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1"/>

           <xs:any namespace='##other'

                   minOccurs='0'

                   maxOccurs='unbounded'

                   processContents='lax'/>

       </xs:sequence>

       <xs:attribute name="session_id" type="xs:base64Binary"

            use="required"/>

   </xs:complexType>

 

According to the session definition, session does not contain start/stop
time while it appears in call flow document. 

<Partha> This issue is related to XML schema in Metadata draft and has to be
fixed in the next revision as 

There was consensus to add start/stop time as part of the session element
</Partha>

 

I am interested which is the up to date version that should be used (call
flow or metadata scheme).

 

Thanks,
Ofir.

 

From: Parthasarathi R [mailto:partha@parthasarathi.co.in] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 5:28 PM
To: Ofir Roth; siprec@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [siprec] draft-ram-siprec-callflows-01

 

Hi Ofir,

 

Thanks for your review. Please read inline.

 

Thanks

Partha

 

From: siprec-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:siprec-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Ofir Roth
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 4:46 PM
To: siprec@ietf.org
Subject: [siprec] draft-ram-siprec-callflows-01

 

Hello,

 

I am reviewing the examples provided in draft-ram-siprec-callflows-01 and
noticed that it is not aligned according to draft-ietf-siprec-metadata-07. 

 

For example: 

 

1.       Session element does not contain start/stop time

<Partha> I guess that you wish to see the example with start/stop time. We
will add in the

 next revision. 

  

BTW,start/stop time are optional elements in session.  So, the callflow is 

inline with metadata -07 draft. 

 

</Partha>

 

2.       Participant does not include disassociate-time (as in section 4.5)

<Partha> Sec 4.5 is call disconnect example and so, disassociate-time
exists. Please let me know the exact location where disassociate-time is
missing. </Partha>

 

If those are known issues, I will appreciate if someone can let me know. 

 

Thanks,
Ofir.