Re: [siprec] draft-ram-siprec-callflows-01

"Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)" <rmohanr@cisco.com> Sat, 20 October 2012 13:03 UTC

Return-Path: <rmohanr@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: siprec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: siprec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70C3521F8789 for <siprec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 20 Oct 2012 06:03:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.161
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.161 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.438, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cYUoUD1GbgRE for <siprec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 20 Oct 2012 06:03:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89B7E21F865F for <siprec@ietf.org>; Sat, 20 Oct 2012 06:03:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3589; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1350738191; x=1351947791; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=ul9Ua4fLUNQrinXC5cHP90YmuR87ezy/9342oSURe1o=; b=E3ysB96ijaM4ASke4O8dwRHmqGYKy9LHwp/XBTjtXHeJBL/bT5xtRJK4 hsQDTuyjfo98ZkvObFk4DvNhrLIzqzNbe1apZYvF3019ZC3SdRIjFWc4K vYnLPIQUY9m0P41TwRYZrc24gvuuSJKfIpr9lS8VTbZu9B8RWPFaYiV3k w=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av8EAJigglCtJV2Y/2dsb2JhbABEwQyBCIIgAQEBAwEBAQEPASc0EA0BCBEEAQELFAkuCxQJCAIEARIIGodcBgubSJ9MBItahg9gA6Q7gWuCb4IY
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,621,1344211200"; d="scan'208";a="133683637"
Received: from rcdn-core-1.cisco.com ([173.37.93.152]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP; 20 Oct 2012 13:03:11 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x10.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x10.cisco.com [173.37.183.84]) by rcdn-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q9KD3As4023033 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Sat, 20 Oct 2012 13:03:11 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x05.cisco.com ([169.254.11.251]) by xhc-rcd-x10.cisco.com ([173.37.183.84]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.001; Sat, 20 Oct 2012 08:03:10 -0500
From: "Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)" <rmohanr@cisco.com>
To: Ofir Roth <Ofir.Roth@nice.com>, Parthasarathi R <partha@parthasarathi.co.in>, "siprec@ietf.org" <siprec@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [siprec] draft-ram-siprec-callflows-01
Thread-Index: AQHNrsNBoux/T2+ES0W7qhHp5LkoQA==
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2012 13:03:10 +0000
Message-ID: <E92E67B176B8B64D8D3A8F5E44E9D8F40DD801@xmb-aln-x05.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D6FF53BFD24F6F448C70DEF68DB4E6655A8BC75BD1@TLVMBX01.nice.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.13.0.110805
x-originating-ip: [10.65.79.196]
x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-10.2.0.1135-7.000.1014-19290.004
x-tm-as-result: No--44.148000-8.000000-31
x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: No
x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <21DA2C94481E3144A55DC606E32994D0@cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [siprec] draft-ram-siprec-callflows-01
X-BeenThere: siprec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Recording Working Group Discussion List <siprec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/siprec>, <mailto:siprec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/siprec>
List-Post: <mailto:siprec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:siprec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/siprec>, <mailto:siprec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2012 13:03:12 -0000

Ofir,

The schema in the ver 08 is the latest one. The examples in callflows-01
are not yet in sync with that.

We will publish soon the call flows.
As paul mentioned in the other thread, we appreciate if you have any call
flows from the implementation/software that we can use.

Regards,
Ram

> On 20/10/12 12:35 AM, "Ofir Roth" <Ofir.Roth@nice.com> wrote:

>Hi,
> 
>According to the metadata scheme:
> 
><xs:complexType name="participant">
>       <xs:sequence>
>           <xs:element name="nameID" type="nameID"
>             maxOccurs="1"/>
>        <xs:any namespace='##other'
>                   minOccurs='0'
>                   maxOccurs='unbounded'
>                   processContents='lax'/>
>       </xs:sequence>
>       <xs:attribute name="participant_id" type="xs:base64Binary"
>            use="required"/>
>       <xs:attribute name="session_id" type="xs:base64Binary"
>            use="required"/>
>   </xs:complexType>
>There is no associate/disassociate time as part of the participant
>definition while it appears in the call flow example of section 4.5.
> 
>And session is defined as follow:
> 
><xs:complexType name="session">
>       <xs:sequence>
>         <xs:element name="reason" type="xs:string"
>                minOccurs="0"/>
>         <xs:element name="group-ref" type="xs:base64Binary"
>                minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1"/>
>           <xs:any namespace='##other'
>                   minOccurs='0'
>                   maxOccurs='unbounded'
>                   processContents='lax'/>
>       </xs:sequence>
>       <xs:attribute name="session_id" type="xs:base64Binary"
>            use="required"/>
>   </xs:complexType>
> 
>According to the session definition, session does not contain start/stop
>time while it appears in call flow document.
> 
>I am interested which is the up to date version that should be used (call
>flow or metadata scheme).
> 
>Thanks,
>Ofir.
> 
>From: Parthasarathi R [mailto:partha@parthasarathi.co.in]
>Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 5:28 PM
>To: Ofir Roth; siprec@ietf.org
>Subject: RE: [siprec] draft-ram-siprec-callflows-01
>
>
> 
>Hi Ofir,
> 
>Thanks for your review. Please read inline.
> 
>Thanks
>Partha
> 
>From: siprec-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:siprec-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
>Of Ofir Roth
>Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 4:46 PM
>To: siprec@ietf.org
>Subject: [siprec] draft-ram-siprec-callflows-01
>
>
> 
>Hello,
> 
>I am reviewing the examples provided in draft-ram-siprec-callflows-01 and
>noticed that it is not aligned according to
>draft-ietf-siprec-metadata-07.
> 
>For example: 
> 
>1.       Session element does not contain start/stop time
><Partha> I guess that you wish to see the example with start/stop time.
>We will add in the
> next revision. 
>  
>BTW,start/stop time are optional elements in session.  So, the callflow
>is 
>inline with metadata -07 draft.
> 
></Partha>
> 
>2.       Participant does not include disassociate-time (as in section
>4.5)
><Partha> Sec 4.5 is call disconnect example and so, disassociate-time
>exists. Please let me know the exact location where disassociate-time is
>missing. </Partha>
> 
>If those are known issues, I will appreciate if someone can let me know.
> 
>Thanks,
>Ofir.
> 
>
>_______________________________________________
>siprec mailing list
>siprec@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/siprec
>