Re: [siprec] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-siprec-metadata-20: (with COMMENT)

"Ben Campbell" <ben@nostrum.com> Mon, 14 March 2016 19:16 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: siprec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: siprec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 820C412D733; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 12:16:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0WmCDoOFCWxp; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 12:16:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AE3112D74F; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 12:16:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.10] (cpe-70-119-203-4.tx.res.rr.com [70.119.203.4]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id u2EJGetn067014 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 14 Mar 2016 14:16:40 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host cpe-70-119-203-4.tx.res.rr.com [70.119.203.4] claimed to be [10.0.1.10]
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
To: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 14:16:39 -0500
Message-ID: <420AB251-70E6-4170-84D2-701A943ABA9A@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <56E10635.7060502@alum.mit.edu>
References: <20160302002515.30664.79446.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <D2FD1094.53195%rmohanr@cisco.com> <2025D20B-7234-4CE3-9E34-E3C0AAFAD5BC@nostrum.com> <D306EF2B.53FCA%rmohanr@cisco.com> <56E10422.2070301@alum.mit.edu> <D3070532.5405F%rmohanr@cisco.com> <56E10635.7060502@alum.mit.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.4r5232)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/siprec/S-Rz_-BJoOj84cvQRf1QsHI4ZTM>
Cc: "draft-ietf-siprec-metadata@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-siprec-metadata@ietf.org>, "siprec@ietf.org" <siprec@ietf.org>, "siprec-chairs@ietf.org" <siprec-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [siprec] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-siprec-metadata-20: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: siprec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Recording Working Group Discussion List <siprec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/siprec>, <mailto:siprec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/siprec/>
List-Post: <mailto:siprec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:siprec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/siprec>, <mailto:siprec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 19:16:50 -0000

On 9 Mar 2016, at 23:29, Paul Kyzivat wrote:

> Paul,
>>
>> Thanks. I will fix the nits you pointed out.
>
>
> The last one is more than a nit. So it might require more discussion. Ben?

Agreed--see separate email.

Ben.